In financial services, credit card theft is a major concern. Thousands of dollars are lost per year because of credit card theft. Research reports on the analysis of credit card data from the real world are lacking due to problems with secrecy. The paper is used to diagnose credit card fraud using machine learning algorithms. First of all, standard versions are included. Hybrid procedures are then used using AdaBoost and plurality voting methods. A public credit card data collection is used to test the efficiency of the model. An analysis of a financial institution's own credit card records is then conducted. In order to better evaluate the robustness of the algorithms, noise is applied to the samples. The experimental findings show that the plurality vote system has strong rates of accuracy in the detection of cases of fraud on credit cards

ALMALKI, AHMED

CHOWRIAPPA, PRADEEP

KALLE, YOGESWAR

English

International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research (IJITR)

Yogeswar Kalle* et al.  (IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH Volume No.10, Issue No.3, April - May  2022, 10076 - 10078.   2320 –5547 @ 2013-2022 http://www.ijitr.com All rights Reserved. Page | 1076  Identify Credit Tag Scheme Using Enhance And The Bulk Of Votes YOGESWAR KALLE Cyberspace Engineering, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, USA AHMED ALMALKI Cyberspace Engineering, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, USA PRADEEP CHOWRIAPPA Computer Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, USA Abstract: In financial services, credit card theft is a major concern. Thousands of dollars are lost per year because of credit card theft. Research reports on the analysis of credit card data from the real world are lacking due to problems with secrecy. The paper is used to diagnose credit card fraud using machine learning algorithms. First of all, standard versions are included. Hybrid procedures are then used using AdaBoost and plurality voting methods. A public credit card data collection is used to test the efficiency of the model. An analysis of a financial institution's own credit card records is then conducted. In order to better evaluate the robustness of the algorithms, noise is applied to the samples. The experimental findings show that the plurality vote system has strong rates of accuracy in the detection of cases of fraud on credit cards. Keywords: Adaboost; Classification; Credit Card; Fraud Detection; Predictive Modelling; Voting; I. INTRODUCTION: Fraud is a misleading or illegal disappointment aimed at bringing financial or personal gains. In avoiding loss from fraud, two mechanisms can be used: fraud prevention and fraud detection. Preventing theft is a constructive way to deter fraud in the first place. Instead, the identification of fraud is necessary if the fraudster attempts a fraudulent transaction. Credit card theft is about using credit card details for payments illegally. Credit card transactions can be accomplished either physically or digitally. The credit card is used in actual transactions during withdrawals [1]. This can occur over the telephone or the internet in automated transactions. Cardholders typically provide the card number, expiry date, and card verification number through telephone or website. With the rise of e-commerce in the past decade, the use of credit cards has increased dramatically. The number of fraud cases has been increasing continuously, in addition to the use of credit cards. While various techniques for authorization have been in operation, cases of credit card theft have not successfully hampered them. The Internet is favoured by fraudsters as their name and position is secret. The increase in credit card fraud affects the banking sector greatly. Loss from credit card fraud affects the merchants, where they bear all costs, including card issuer fees, charges, and administrative charges. Since the merchants need to bear the loss, some goods are priced higher, or discounts and incentives are reduced. Therefore, it is crucial to minimise the damage, and an efficient fraud detection scheme to reduce or remove fraud cases is necessary. Various studies were conducted on the detection of credit card fraud. Machine education, including artificial neural networks, rule-induction approaches, decision-making processes, logistic regression and supporting vector machines, is the most common application. a total of twelve machine learning algorithms are used for detecting credit card fraud. The algorithms vary from normal neural networks to deep learning ones [2]. They are evaluated using both benchmark and real world credit card data sets. In comparison, the AdaBoost and plurality voting approaches are applied for forming hybrid models. Noise is applied to the real-world data collection to help test the robustness and stability of models. The core contribution of this paper is the comparison of a number of machine learning models for a real-world credit card data collection for fraud detection. While other researchers have used various methods on publicly available data sets, the data set used in this are extracted from actual credit card transaction information over three months. II. EXISTING SYSTEM: The proposal included a rule-based filter, Dumpster–Shafer Adder, account histories, and Bayesian learner and a credit card fraud identification method. The Theory of Dempster-Shafer incorporated some evidence and produced an initial belief to identify a transaction as natural, suspicious or irregular [3]. When the transaction was suspicious, the conviction was further analyzed with Bayesian learning transaction history. The findings of the simulation showed a favorable rating of 98 percent. For credit card fraud identification, a revamped Fisher Discriminate function has been employed. The Yogeswar Kalle* et al.  (IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH Volume No.10, Issue No.3, April - May  2022, 10076 - 10078.   2320 –5547 @ 2013-2022 http://www.ijitr.com All rights Reserved. Page | 1077  change made the conventional roles more responsive to key instances. A weighted average was used to measure differences that allow productive transactions to be learned. The results of the updated feature confirm that more benefit is possible. For extracting activity patterns for credit card fraud cases, association principles are used. The data collection was based on Chilean retail firms. Using the Fuzzy Query 2+ data mining platform, data samples were defuzzified and analyzed. As a result, excessive regulations decreased, simplifying the tasks of fraud analysts. A solution was presented to improve the monitoring of cases of credit card theft. A Turkish bank data collection has been used. Each transaction was considered to be dishonest or not. By using the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and scatter scan, the misclassification rate was minimised. Compared to previous findings, the proposed approach doubled the efficiency. There is no credit card scam identification voting strategy. In the current scheme, there are no machine learning techniques. III. PROPOSED SYSTEM: Twelve machine algorithms for the detection of credit card fraud have been used in the proposed system. The algorithms vary from normal neural networks to profound models for learning. They are evaluated using both benchmark and real world credit card data sets. In addition, the AdaBoost and majority voting methods are applied for forming hybrid models [4] [5]. Noise is added to the real-world data set to assess further the robustness and reliability of models. The key contribution of this paper is the evaluation of a variety of machine learning models with a real-world credit card data set for fraud detection. Whereas other researchers have used different methods for public data sets, the data set used in this paper is collected over a period of three months from actual credit card transaction information. Due to AdaBoost technology, the machine is very fast. Effective Majority Voting techniques. IV. IMPLEMENTATION: Bank Admin The Admin needs the use of a correct username and password to access in this module. Upon good login, he can do operations like the Profile of Bank Admin. View and enable users, View See and authorise users of the ecommerce website, Add Bank, add bank Details of the bank, Requests for Credit Card, Please see all ranked products Check out any financial fraud, See all Random Forest Tree Financial Frauds With False CVV, View all Random Forest Tree Financial Fraud Usage Expired Date, List of all financial fraud-majority users Display product rank in table, Display majority vote in the chart, Display majority vote with expiry date use in chart [6].  View and Authorize Users In this module, the admin will see the list of users who all registered. In this, the admin will see the user’s information such as, user name, password, address and admin authorises the accounts. View Chart Results Show Product Rank In Chart, Show Majority Voting With Wrong CVV Fraud in chart, Show Majority Voting with Expiry date Usage in chart. Ecommerce User Numbers of users are present in this module. Before carrying out any activities, the user should log. The data will be stored in the database until user registration is established. Using the authorised user name and password, you have to login after registering successfully. Once logged in successfully, users can perform such activities such as Add category, Add products, View all products and view all products purchased with full bill, View all financial frauds. End User Numbers of users are present in this module. Before carrying out any activities, the user should log. The data will be stored in the database until user registration is established. Using the authorised user name and password, you have to login after registering successfully. Upon successful login the user can complete certain operations such as, my profile view, bank account management, credit card requests view information on credit card, credit card transfers to your credit card account, keyword search of products, Total Bill displays all purchases of products .  Fig 1: System Architecture Yogeswar Kalle* et al.  (IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH Volume No.10, Issue No.3, April - May  2022, 10076 - 10078.   2320 –5547 @ 2013-2022 http://www.ijitr.com All rights Reserved. Page | 1078  V. CONCLUSIONS: The publicly accessible card data collection has been used. The MCC metric was introduced as an indicator of success because the real and false positive and negative expected results are taken into account. The best result from MCC is 0.823, obtained by plurality vote. An appraisal was also made using a real credit card data collection from a financial institution. The same versions were used individually and hybridly. The AdaBoost and plurality voting systems were used to obtain a perfect MCC score of 1. Noise from 10% to 30% was applied to the data samples to better test the hybrid versions. The MCC score of 0.942 for 30 percent additional noise to the data set is provided by most voting system. This shows that the majority voting method is stable in performance in the presence of noise. For future work, online learning frameworks will be expanded to use the approaches discussed in this article. In addition, other online learning models will be investigated. By using online training, fraud cases can be detected quickly, perhaps in real time. This in turn will help detect and prevent fraudulent transactions in advance, thus reducing the daily losses in the financial sector. REFERENCES: [1]  A. O. Adewumi and A. A. Akinyelu, “A survey of machine-learning and nature-inspired based credit card fraud detection techniques,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, vol. 8, pp. 937–953, 2017. [2]  The Nilson Report (October 2016) [Online]. Available: https://www.nilsonreport.com/upload/content_promo/The_Nilson_Report_10-17-2016.pdf [3]  N. S. Halvaiee and M. K. Akbari, “A novel model for credit card fraud detection using Artificial Immune Systems,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 24, pp. 40–49, 2014.  [4]  S. Panigrahi, A. Kundu, S. Sural, and A. K. Majumdar, “Credit card fraud detection: A fusion approach using Dempster–Shafer theory and Bayesian learning,” Information Fusion, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 354–363, 2009. [9] N. Mahmoudi and E. Duman, “Detecting credit card fraud by modified Fisher discriminant analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 2510–2516, 2015. [5]  E. Rahimikia, S. Mohammadi, T. Rahmani, and M. Ghazanfari, “Detecting corporate tax evasion using a hybrid intelligent system: A case study of Iran,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, vol. 25, pp. 1–17, 2017.  [6]  I. T. Christou, M. Bakopoulos, T. Dimitriou, E. Amolochitis, S. Tsekeridou, and C. Dimitriadis, “Detecting fraud in online games of chance and lotteries,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 13158–13169, 2011.  [7]  C. F. Tsai, “Combining cluster analysis with classifier ensembles to predict financial distress” Information Fusion, vol. 16, pp. 46–58, 2014.  [8]  F. H. Chen, D. J. Chi, and J. Y. Zhu, “Application of Random Forest, Rough Set Theory, Decision Tree and Neural Network to Detect Financial Statement Fraud–Taking Corporate Governance into Consideration,” In International Conference on Intelligent Computing, pp. 221–234, Springer, 2014. 

Identify Credit Tag Scheme Using Enhance And The Bulk Of Votes

https://www.ijitr.com/index.php/ojs/article/download/2740/pdf

Identify Credit Tag Scheme Using Enhance And The Bulk Of Votes

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research (IJITR)