Type I error probability spending functions are commonly used for designing
sequential analysis of binomial data in clinical trials, but it is also quickly emerging
for near?continuous sequential analysis of post?market drug and vaccine
safety surveillance. It iswell known that, for clinical trials,when the null hypothesis
is not rejected, it is still important to minimize the sample size. Unlike
in post?market drug and vaccine safety surveillance, that is not important. In
post?market safety surveillance, specially when the surveillance involves identification
of potential signals, the meaningful statistical performance measure to
be minimized is the expected sample size when the null hypothesis is rejected.
The present paper shows that, instead of the convex Type I error spending
shape conventionally used in clinical trials, a concave shape is more indicated
for post?market drug and vaccine safety surveillance. This is shown for both,
continuous and group sequential analysis