Hodges, Alan W.

Mulkey, W. David

Muraro, Ronald P.

Spreen, Thomas H.

AgEcon Search - Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics

  Give to AgEcon Search    The World’s Largest Open Access Agricultural & Applied Economics Digital Library    This document is discoverable and free to researchers across the globe due to the work of AgEcon Search.    Help ensure our sustainability.         AgEcon Search http://ageconsearch.umn.edu aesearch@umn.edu          Papers downloaded from AgEcon Search may be used for non-commercial purposes and personal study only. No other use, including posting to another Internet site, is permitted without permission from the copyright owner (not AgEcon Search), or as allowed under the provisions of Fair Use, U.S. Copyright Act, Title 17 U.S.C.  1     PBTC 02-6 COUNTY PROPERTY VALUES AND TAX IMPACTS OF FLORIDA’S CITRUS INDUSTRY  By   Alan W. Hodges, W. David Mulkey, Ronald P. Muraro, & Thomas H. Spreen  PBTC 03-13        November 2003 POLICY BRIEF SERIES PBTC 03-13  2INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND POLICY CENTER  MISSION AND SCOPE: The International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center (IATPC) was established in 1990 in the Food and Resource Economics Department (FRED) of the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) at the University of Florida. Its mission is to provide information, education, and research directed to immediate and long-term enhancement and sustainability of international trade and natural resource use. Its scope includes not only trade and related policy issues, but also agricultural, rural, resource, environmental, food, state, national and international policies, regulations, and issues that influence trade and development.  OBJECTIVES:   The Center’s objectives are to:  • Serve as a university-wide focal point and resource base for research on international agricultural trade and trade policy issues • Facilitate dissemination of agricultural trade related research results and publications • Encourage interaction between researchers, business and industry groups, state and federal agencies, and policymakers in the examination and discussion of agricultural trade policy questions • Provide support to initiatives that enable a better understanding of trade and policy issues that impact the competitiveness of Florida and southeastern agriculture specialty crops and livestock in the U.S. and international markets  3County Property Values and Tax Impacts of Florida’s Citrus Industry Alan W. Hodges, W. David Mulkey, Ronald P. Muraro, and Thomas H. Spreen  University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Food and Resource Economics Department, Gainesville, Florida Keywords: citrus, Florida, counties, economic impact, ad valorem property taxes, tax impacts  Introduction Citrus fruits, such as oranges, grapefruit, tangelos, tangerines, limes, and other specialty fruits, are among the state’s largest agricultural commodities. Florida accounts for over 80 percent of the United States’ production of citrus, and is the second largest producer in the world, following Brazil. Citrus is consumed as fresh fruit or utilized for processing into a variety of juice products.  The citrus industry in Florida is an important sector of the state’s agricultural economy. In the 2001-02 season, Florida produced 287 million boxes, or nearly 15 million metric tons of citrus fruit, which represented an on-tree value of $879 million, prior to the value added operations of harvesting, hauling, packing, or processing (FASS, 2003).  The total economic impacts associated with the citrus industry in 2000 were estimated at $9.13 billion in industry output, including an indirect output impact of $2.13 billion attributed to purchases from other industry sectors, and an induced impact of $2.93 billion resulting from household spending of earnings by industry employees (Hodges, et al., 2001). The industry also contributed $4.18 billion in value added income to the gross regional product of the state’s economy and provided 89,700 jobs.  Citrus groves in Florida occupy nearly 800,000 acres of agricultural land in Figure 1. Map of commercial citrus acreage in Florida, by county, 2002 (Source: FASS, 2003).  432 counties in the central and southern parts of the state, with production concentrated in 7 counties where each has over 50,000 acres (Figure 1).  In several rural counties in the interior of the Florida peninsula, including Hendry, Glades, Highlands, DeSoto, and Hardee, citrus groves are a predominant agricultural land use, and as such are an important contributor to the local tax base. Citrus processing operations also generate significant tax revenues for local, state, and federal governments. The state and local taxes are important from a public policy standpoint because they pay for most of the local infrastructure development and public services. Ad valorem property tax revenues are the primary source of local funds for school districts, water management districts, libraries, emergency services, and general operations of municipal and county governments.  Events impacting the citrus industry, such as citrus canker or increased foreign competition due to liberalization of trade barriers, may have a dramatic impact on the welfare of local communities. This paper provides estimates of the local fiscal impacts of ad valorem property taxes paid by citrus grove owners, and taxes generated by citrus processing operations.  County Ad Valorem Property Taxes on Citrus Orchards  Current information on property values of agricultural lands in Florida was obtained from the Florida Department of Revenue (2003). This information included total assessed value, land value, and “just” value. Total assessed value reflects investments in established citrus groves and other property improvements, while land value is for bare land exclusive of improvements. Just values represent an estimated market value adjusted for typical sale transaction costs (realtor commissions, title inspection, documentary stamps, etc). Typically, assessed values for agricultural land are significantly below the estimated market value because they reflect only the agricultural use value rather than non-agricultural uses. The original source of this information is the property appraisers in each Florida county. Various assessment methods are used by property appraisers, which include both asset-based and income-based approaches. Assessed property value data were compiled for orchards (land use code 66), representing citrus groves as well as other fruit and nut tree farms, such as pecans and tropical fruits. For the 27 counties in central and south Florida, these data were assumed to represent citrus groves, since pecan orchards are restricted to the northern part of the state. Miami-Dade County was excluded because it has a significant acreage of commercial tropical fruit orchards, and its production of citrus is rather small. Ad valorem property tax millage rates for each county were compiled from reports by the Florida Department of Revenue (2003). The millage represents the annual tax levied per $1000 of  5assessed property value. Millage rates are reported separately for public schools, water management districts, libraries, debt service, and general operations of county governments and municipalities. The total countywide millage varied widely among the 28 counties, from a low of 11.5 in Collier County to a high of 29.6 in Pinellas County (Table 1). The total county millage was multiplied against the total assessed value of orchard lands in each county to estimate the ad valorem property tax revenues from citrus groves.  The number of separate orchard land parcels was 22,306 (Table 1). Total assessed values for orchard lands in Florida amounted to $2.21 billion, including an assessed value on bare land of $1.89 billion, while the total just (market) value of orchard lands was $5.88 billion. Assessed values for orchard land exceeded $200 million in Polk, Hendry, and Highlands Counties. Market values for orchards were over $500 million in Polk, Hendry, and St. Lucie Counties. Based on countywide millage rates, total ad valorem property taxes levied on orchard lands in Florida were estimated at $38.95 million annually (Table 1). Tax levies exceeded $1 million in eleven counties and were highest in the counties of Hendry ($5.99M), Polk ($5.05M), Highlands ($4.57M), and DeSoto ($3.14M). Note that these figures do not account for property tax exemptions, such as the homestead exemption for a landowner’s primary residence; however, this would probably not apply to most citrus grove lands.  As an indicator of their relative importance to overall county government fiscal balances, property tax revenues from orchards (citrus groves) were compared to total countywide tax revenues provided by the Florida Department of Revenue (2002). Total county taxes levied by these 27 counties in 2002, excluding municipal and less-than-countywide taxes, amounted to $9.46 billion (Table 1). Overall, estimated property taxes on orchards represented 0.41 percent of the total taxes levied. In some rural counties, however, the share of total tax revenues from orchard land was substantially higher, particularly in DeSoto and Hendry Counties where it was 21.3 and 19.3 percent, respectively (see right column of Table 1). A second tier of counties with a relatively high share of tax revenues from orchard lands included Hardee (12.3%), Glades (9.8%), and Highlands (8.5%). A third tier of counties with shares of at least one percent included Okeechobee (3.2%), Polk (1.7%), Indian River (1.4%), and St. Lucie (1.4%).        6Table 1. Citrus property values and estimated ad valorem taxes levied in Florida counties, 2002-03.County Parcel Count Assessed Value (million$) Just (Market) Value (million$)Assessed Land Value (million$)Total County Millage Rate* Est. Taxes Levied on Orchard Land ($1000)** Total County Taxes Levied (million$) Share of Total County Taxes on Orchard Land (percent)Brevard 402 44.2 104.3 83.7 14.890 658 320.0 0.21Broward 24 3.2 8.2 1.4 16.945 55 1,610.2 <0.00Charlotte 345 57.1 135.6 54.2 14.205 811 128.4 0.63Citrus 21 0.2 0.6 0.1 18.223 4 105.6 <0.00Collier 259 87.8 293.3 81.5 11.466 1,007 448.8 0.22DeSoto 2,424 181.2 459.1 166.2 17.345 3,144 14.8 21.30Glades 104 41.1 75.5 38.6 19.046 784 8.0 9.76Hardee 1,815 133.3 356.3 109.5 17.931 2,390 19.5 12.29Hendry 1,022 284.4 626.8 271.9 21.062 5,989 31.1 19.26Hernando 85 3.2 11.4 1.7 18.273 58 94.2 0.06Highlands 1,596 247.2 366.7 230.8 18.472 4,566 54.1 8.45Hillsborough 1,687 123.6 329.6 70.2 18.262 2,257 798.3 0.28Indian River 921 104.0 442.8 87.4 16.603 1,726 122.7 1.41Lake 1,410 68.6 98.0 37.1 15.678 1,076 138.3 0.78Lee 675 44.8 92.1 36.0 15.011 672 540.8 0.12Manatee 464 73.3 169.7 62.2 16.460 1,207 278.0 0.43Martin 403 59.0 197.0 48.0 15.153 894 181.5 0.49Okeechobee 127 34.7 72.5 31.1 18.143 630 19.6 3.22Orange 541 53.7 240.4 38.3 16.797 901 769.7 0.12Osceola 467 39.7 169.0 31.2 16.004 635 168.4 0.38Palm Beach 123 38.0 191.5 30.8 16.076 610 1,417.8 0.04Pasco 506 46.6 131.5 35.5 18.009 839 220.8 0.38Pinellas 19 1.7 9.2 1.4 29.649 49 766.7 0.01Polk 5,509 291.5 697.8 215.4 17.322 5,049 293.9 1.72St. Lucie 1,149 134.2 566.8 120.1 20.855 2,798 194.6 1.44Sarasota 39 5.2 14.9 3.0 14.836 76 443.6 0.02Seminole 169 4.4 18.6 3.5 14.670 65 271.2 0.02Total 22,306 2,206 5,879 1,891 38,950 9,460.4 0.41  * Millage rate represents dollars of tax levied per $1000 assessed value. ** Estimate does not account for property tax exemptions. Source: Florida Department of Revenue.    Tax Impacts of Citrus Processing Another important fiscal impact of the citrus industry is the taxes that are generated by citrus processing operations. Citrus processors are a highly regulated food-manufacturing business, which incurs significant taxes and other costs for environmental, labor, and foods safety controls. About 90 percent of the oranges produced in Florida are processed for juice and other by-products.  In the 1999-2000 season, Florida citrus processors had total output valued at $3.58 billion, with exports to customers outside the state worth $3.33 billion (Hodges, et al., 2001).   7Taxes generated by the citrus processing industry in Florida were estimated using an input-output economic modeling software package known as Implan (MIG, Inc.), together with regional economic data and other information. The Implan software enables the estimation of economic multipliers that account for the secondary impacts of industrial activity on other businesses that provide purchased inputs (indirect effects) and consumer spending by employees (induced effects). Economic multipliers apply to exogenous changes in the final demand, such as export shipments, which bring “new” money into the regional economy and stimulate additional economic activity. Further background on this method and the development of a regional economic model of the Florida citrus industry are described by Hodges, et al. (2001). The estimated tax impacts of exports by the Florida citrus processing industry in the 1999-2000 season are summarized in Table 2. The total tax impact was $854 million, including federal government taxes of $608 million and state/local taxes of $246 million. The total tax impact represented $256,233 per million dollars of processed citrus exports, or 26 percent of the export value. The largest single tax item was personal federal income taxes paid by industry employees ($251M). Among the state and local tax impacts were $117 million in sales tax and $77 million in property taxes. The latter figure includes some of the already noted property taxes paid by grove owners, which are backward-linked to processors. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to sum together these two independent estimates of tax impacts. It is important to note that these estimates represent the total economy-wide tax impacts of the citrus industry on other related businesses and industry employees.                         8Table 2. Tax Impacts of Processed Citrus Exports from Florida, 1999-2000. Tax Type Total Impact  ($1000) Federal Government Taxes 608,098  Corporate Profits Tax 74,669  Customs Duty 5,899  Excise Taxes 18,506  Business Fines & Fees 4,636  Personal Income Tax 250,829  Social Insurance Tax – Employee Contribution 127,419  Social Insurance Tax – Employer Contribution 123,753  State/Local Government Taxes 246,150  Corporate Profits Tax 8,288  Dividends 130  Motor Vehicle License 1,843  Other Taxes 11,968  Property Tax 77,892  State & Local Fines & Fees 13,484  Sales Tax 117,721  Severance Tax 340  Motor Vehicle License 3,539  Personal Fines & Fees 5,862  Social Insurance Tax – Employee Contribution 920  Social Insurance Tax – Employer Contribution 4,193  Total All Taxes  854,248    Conclusions It is apparent that the Florida citrus industry is a significant contributor of tax revenues to local, state, and federal governments. Total ad valorem property taxes levied on Florida citrus groves were estimated at nearly $39 million. Moreover, property taxes on citrus groves are an important part of the local tax base in certain rural counties of Florida (e.g., DeSoto and Hendry), where property taxes on citrus orchards may represent over 20 percent of the tax base. Local government fiscal balances are critically dependent upon the continued well-being of the citrus industry in these areas. In some larger urbanized counties, such as Polk and St. Lucie, the citrus industry is also sizeable, but contributes a smaller portion of total county tax revenues.  The citrus processing industry is also an important source of taxes for all levels of governments, amounting to an estimated $854 million in 1999-2000.   9References  Florida Agricultural Statistics Service (FASS), Citrus Summary 2000-02. Tallahassee, Florida, January 2003. Florida Department of Revenue. Agricultural land use data, run AVR34, September 2003. Florida Department of Revenue. Florida Property Valuations & Tax Data Report, December 2002. Hodges, A., E. Philippakos, D. Mulkey, T. Spreen, and R. Muraro. Economic Impact of Florida’s Citrus Industry, 1999-2000. Economic Information Report EI 01-02, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, July 2001, 14 pp. Available at http://economicimpact.ifas.ufl.edu or http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FE307. Minnesota Implan Group, Inc. (MIG) Implan Social Accounting and Impact Analysis Software, and County Data for Florida. Stillwater, MN: MIG, 2003.  

COUNTY PROPERTY VALUES AND TAX IMPACTS OF FLORIDA'S CITRUS INDUSTRY

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

AgEcon Search - Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics

AgEcon Search: Research in Agricultural and Applied Economics