On the hull and interval numbers of oriented graphs

Abstract

In this work, for a given oriented graph DD, we study its interval and hull numbers, denoted by in(D){in}(D) and hn(D){hn}(D), respectively, in the geodetic, P3{P_3} and P3βˆ—{P_3^*} convexities. This last one, we believe to be formally defined and first studied in this paper, although its undirected version is well-known in the literature. Concerning bounds, for a strongly oriented graph DD, we prove that hng(D)≀m(D)βˆ’n(D)+2{hn_g}(D)\leq m(D)-n(D)+2 and that there is a strongly oriented graph such that hng(D)=m(D)βˆ’n(D){hn_g}(D) = m(D)-n(D). We also determine exact values for the hull numbers in these three convexities for tournaments, which imply polynomial-time algorithms to compute them. These results allows us to deduce polynomial-time algorithms to compute hnP3(D){hn_{P_3}}(D) when the underlying graph of DD is split or cobipartite. Moreover, we provide a meta-theorem by proving that if deciding whether ing(D)≀k{in_g}(D)\leq k or hng(D)≀k{hn_g}(D)\leq k is NP-hard or W[i]-hard parameterized by kk, for some i∈Z+βˆ—i\in\mathbb{Z_+^*}, then the same holds even if the underlying graph of DD is bipartite. Next, we prove that deciding whether hnP3(D)≀k{hn_{P_3}}(D)\leq k or hnP3βˆ—(D)≀k{hn_{P_3^*}}(D)\leq k is W[2]-hard parameterized by kk, even if the underlying graph of DD is bipartite; that deciding whether inP3(D)≀k{in_{P_3}}(D)\leq k or inP3βˆ—(D)≀k{in_{P_3^*}}(D)\leq k is NP-complete, even if DD has no directed cycles and the underlying graph of DD is a chordal bipartite graph; and that deciding whether inP3(D)≀k{in_{P_3}}(D)\leq k or inP3βˆ—(D)≀k{in_{P_3^*}}(D)\leq k is W[2]-hard parameterized by kk, even if the underlying graph of DD is split. We also argue that the interval and hull numbers in the oriented P3P_3 and P3βˆ—P_3^* convexities can be computed in polynomial time for graphs of bounded tree-width by using Courcelle's theorem

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions