CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Polymer-Based Versus Polymer-Free Stents in High Bleeding Risk Patients: Final 2-Year Results From Onyx ONE
Authors
Alexandre Abizaid
Ziad A. Ali
+29 more
Adel Aminian
Franco Fabbiocchi
Martin Hudec
Seung-Ho Hur
Abdul Kahar bin Abdul Ghapar
David E. Kandzari
Elvin Kedhi
Hyo-Soo Kim
Ajay J. Kirtane
Azeem Latib
Te-Hsin Lung
Steven O. Marx
Roxana Mehran
Raul Moreno
Darren Mylotte
Maria Parke
Sanjeevan Pasupati
Ivo Petrov
Eduardo Pinar
Petra Poliacikova
Matthew J. Price
Kamaraj Selvaraj
Daniel I. Simon
Gregg W. Stone
Charles Tie
Stephan Windecker
Adrian Wlodarczak
Stephen G. Worthley
Azfar Zaman
Publication date
1 June 2022
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Abstract
© 2022 American College of Cardiology FoundationBackground: Resolute Onyx polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were noninferior in safety and effectiveness to BioFreedom polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stents (DCS) in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) at 1 year. Objectives: This study reports the final 2-year results of the randomized Onyx ONE trial. Methods: The Onyx ONE (A Randomized Controlled Trial With Resolute Onyx in One Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) for High-Bleeding Risk Patients) trial randomly assigned HBR patients to treatment with ZES or DCS. Following 1-month DAPT, event-free patients received SAPT (either aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor at physician discretion). The primary safety endpoint, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, was determined at 1 year. Rates of primary and secondary endpoints were calculated after final follow-up at 2 years. Results: A total of 1,003 patients were randomly allocated to ZES and 993 patients to DCS. Follow-up was complete in 980 (97.7%) ZES patients and 962 (96.9%) DCS patients at 2 years. The primary safety endpoint occurred in 208 (21.2%) patients in the ZES group and 199 (20.7%) patients in the DCS group (risk difference: 0.5%; 95% CI: −3.1% to 4.2%; P = 0.78) at 2 years without significant differences in individual components of the composite endpoint. The secondary effectiveness endpoint occurred in 217 (22.1%) patients in the ZES group and 202 (21.0%) patients in the DCS group (risk difference: 1.1%; 95% CI: −2.5% to 4.8%; P = 0.54). Conclusions: Among patients at HBR treated with 1-month DAPT followed by SAPT, the Resolute Onyx polymer-based ZES had similar 2-year outcomes for the primary safety and secondary effectiveness endpoint compared with the BioFreedom polymer-free DCS. (A Randomized Controlled Trial With Resolute Onyx in One Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy [DAPT] for High-Bleeding Risk Patients [Onyx ONE]; NCT03344653)N
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
SNU Open Repository and Archive
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:s-space.snu.ac.kr:10371/18...
Last time updated on 13/10/2022