CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Applying the stress guidelines for reproducibility in modeling & simulation: Application to a disease modeling case study
Authors
Anastasia Anagnostou (7197800)
Bhakti S. Onggo (7198199)
+5 more
Christine S. Currie (7198196)
Martin Kunc (4347397)
Simon J. Taylor (1503271)
Stewart Robinson (1258410)
Thomas Monks (3553064)
Publication date
1 January 2019
Publisher
Abstract
© 2018 IEEE It is arguably difficult to reproduce the results of published work in Modeling & Simulation (M&S). Authors have certainly raised concerns about this issue and attempts by journals and conferences are being made to improve the situation. As part of a movement to tackle reproducibility in M&S, the Strengthening The Reporting of Empirical Simulation Studies (STRESS) reporting checklists were introduced in 2018. The STRESS guidelines aimed to improve knowledge management in industry and to maximize the chance that all important M&S details are included when writing up simulation research for publication. We extend this work by providing an applied example of using the STRESS-ABS checklist for documenting an Agent Based Simulation model. It is hoped that an applied example will both encourage and guide authors and practitioners to improve their reporting
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Loughborough University Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:figshare.com:article/94991...
Last time updated on 26/03/2020