We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study to examine and
compare treatment coverage of lymphatic filariasis by the health system
(HST) and a health system implemented, community-directed treatment for
the control of lymphatic filariasis (ComDT/HS) in 44 randomly selected
villages in coastal Kenya. Demographic information on the villages and
peripheral health facilities to guide design and implementation was
obtained from a situation analysis phase of this study. A series of
interactive training sessions on basic biology of lymphatic filariasis,
concept and philosophy of ComDT/HS were given to members of the
District Health Management Team (DHMT), peripheral health staff,
community leaders and community drug distributors (CDDs) prior to
ivermectin distribution. An intensive sensitization process of the
community by the trained peripheral health staff and community leaders
followed before selection of the CDDs. Quantitative and qualitative
data for evaluation of the study were collected by coverage surveys of
randomly selected households, focus group discussions and interviews,
immediately after the drug distribution. Treatment coverage of all
eligible persons was 46.5 and 88% in HST and ComDT/HS villages,
respectively, P < 0.001. In comparing treatment coverage by the two
study arms in relationship to the distance from a health facility,
coverage among HST and not ComDT/HS villages was influenced by
distance. In Kenya, ComDT/HS can effectively be implemented by the
regular health system and can attain coverage levels compatible with
the global filariasis elimination goal