Blackmore, Tim

Eder, Kerstin

Masamba, Nyasha

English

Constrained random test generation is one of the most widely adopted methods for generating stimuli for simulation-based verification. Randomness leads to test diversity, but tests tend to repeatedly exercise the same design logic. Constraints are written (typically manually) to bias random tests towards interesting, hard-to-reach, and yet-untested logic. However, as verification progresses, most constrained random tests yield little to no effect on functional coverage. If stimuli generation consumes significantly less resources than simulation, then a better approach involves randomly generating a large number of tests, selecting the most effective subset, and only simulating that subset. In this paper, we introduce a novel method for automatic constraint extraction and test selection. This method, which we call coverage-directed test selection, is based on supervised learning from coverage feedback. Our method biases selection towards tests that have a high probability of increasing functional coverage, and prioritises them for simulation. We show how coverage-directed test selection can reduce manual constraint writing, prioritise effective tests, reduce verification resource consumption, and accelerate coverage closure on a large, real-life industrial hardware design

Explore Bristol Research

Supervised Learning for Coverage-Directed Test Selection in Simulation-Based Verification

https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/files/333771929/CDS_AITest_camready.pdf

Supervised Learning for Coverage-Directed Test Selection in Simulation-Based Verification

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Explore Bristol Research