We investigate the experimental data of the turning process and the appearance of chatter vibrations. We focused on the turning of stainless steel as the example of a special material, which belongs to a hardly machinable class. To characterize the vibration properties we used statistical, multifractal, and wavelet analyses. The multifractal approach estimates complexity of the examined time series of the cutting thrust force. We report that the evolution of the vibration towards fairly large amplitude unwanted chatter with the increasing cutting depth coincides with lowering of the complexity. The results have been confirmed by continuous wavelet analysis

Litak, Grzegorz

Rusinek, Rafal

JVE International

 615. VIBRATIONS IN STAINLESS STEEL TURNING: MULTIFRACTAL AND WAVELET APPROACHES. GRZEGORZ LITAK AND RAFAŁ RUSINEK    VIBROENGINEERING. JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING.   MARCH 2011. VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1. ISSN 1392-8716 102 615. Vibrations in stainless steel turning: multifractal          and wavelet approaches   Grzegorz Litak a,b,1 and Rafał Rusinek a aDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Lublin University of Technology,  Nadbystrzycka 36, PL-20-618 Lublin, Poland bDepartment of Architecture, Buildings and Structures, Polytechnic University of Marche,  Via Brecce Bianche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy E-mail:  1 g.litak@pollub.pl  (Received 02 November 2010; accepted 4 February 2011)     Abstract. We investigate the experimental data of the turning process and the appearance of chatter vibrations. We focused on the turning of stainless steel as the example of a special material, which belongs to a hardly machinable class. To characterize the vibration properties we used statistical, multifractal, and wavelet analyses. The multifractal approach estimates complexity of the examined time series of the cutting thrust force. We report that the evolution of the vibration towards fairly large amplitude unwanted chatter with the increasing cutting depth coincides with lowering of the complexity. The results have been confirmed by continuous wavelet analysis.  Keywords: vibrations, stainless steel, multifractal, wavelet.   Introduction and experiment  Mechanical machining processes are the main technologies to obtain designed surface [1]. Unfortunately, in certain working conditions this process is unstable to chatter vibrations which destroy the process precision and finally lower product quality [2]. These cutting instabilities are due to the complex dynamics including the memory effects of the previous tool passes, the nonuniform nature of cutting material, dry friction phenomenon between the tool and the workpiece and their contact loss [1–7]. To understand and identify the instabilities, more precise experiments using different materials were performed. In this note we analyze the time series obtained from the turning process of the stainless steel. Fig. 1a illustrates turning process geometry with specified directions. The turning experiment has been conducted using the workpiece circular shaft of stainless steel (EZ6NCT25) with the diameter of 22 mm and the tool cutting edge angle of 45 degrees. The shaft angular velocity was fixed to abut 780 rpm while the corresponding feeding ratio was 0.25 mm/rev. The sampling frequency was fixed at 2 kHz. The measured time series of a thrust component Fy of the total cutting force are plotted in Fig. 1b. Note that vibrations in the y direction, and simultaneously oscillations of the Fy force component (Fig. 1a), influence the quality of the surface directly. Note also that the oscillations of Fy increases with the cutting depth d. Namely, starting from the case (3) we observe the considerable increase in the vibration amplitude (se  cases (4) and (5) in Fig. 1b).    615. VIBRATIONS IN STAINLESS STEEL TURNING: MULTIFRACTAL AND WAVELET APPROACHES. GRZEGORZ LITAK AND RAFAŁ RUSINEK    VIBROENGINEERING. JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING.   MARCH 2011. VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1. ISSN 1392-8716 103  Fig. 1. (a) The schema of a turning process. The three orthogonal measured force components: feed Fx, thrust Fy, and cutting Fz. (b) Fy time series of the stainless steel turning process v r us sampling number n for five different cutting depths d (referred in the text as the cases (1)–(5)). The sampling frequency was chosen at 2 kHz.   Multifractal analysis  The next step of our analysis is to estimate the critical exponent distribution estimated along the time series. In addition to a range of oscillation amplitudes, many complex processes exhibit multiple time scales. A convenient way to describe the dynamics of such multiscale processes is to use multifractals. A multifractal process evolves simultaneously over multiple time scales and requires a spectrum of scaling exponents to capture its full range of dynamics. One approach for describing such a spectrum is to use the so-called Hölder exponent. The broadness of the singularity spectrum is one measur of complexity of the process. Consider a real-valued function F(t). The single Hölder exponent α of this function at a point ti = t0 is defined as follows [8,9]:  615. VIBRATIONS IN STAINLESS STEEL TURNING: MULTIFRACTAL AND WAVELET APPROACHES. GRZEGORZ LITAK AND RAFAŁ RUSINEK    VIBROENGINEERING. JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING.   MARCH 2011. VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1. ISSN 1392-8716 104      (1)  where Pn(t) is a polynomial of degree less than α and C is a constant. For the complex systems the distribution D(α) form a continuous band. The property of the exponent α distributions determines the important parameters: the size of band ∆α = αmax − αmin and the noise correlation parameter defined to the α = αtop such that the distribution function D(α) reaches its maximum. This parameter (αtop), similarly to Hurst exponent, indicates how persistent the examined stochastic process is. If αtop < 0.5 the process is anti–persistent (negatively correlated) while αtop > 0.5 is persistent (positively correlated). The two cases αtop = 0.0 and αtop = 0.5 correspond to a Gaussian random process characterized by the series of random numbers and Brownian random walk characterized by random steps, respectively. Now we apply the method of multifractals to the series presented in Fig. 1b. The resulting band is obtained by fitting the polynomial of the 8th order to the calculated points and their values for D(α) = 0 determine αmin and αmax. In Fig. 2a we show the most interesting cases illustrating the process path to chatter (the cases (2),(3), and (4)). Finally, in Fig. 2b we show all the cases (1)–(5) in a plane spanned by parameters ∆α and αtop. We found that the evolution of the vibration towards fairly large amplitude vibrations with the increasing cutting depth d coincides with lowering of the complexity ∆α. Namely, for the sequence of the cases (2)–(5) we get ∆α = 1.035, 0.876, 0.802, and 0.704, respectively. Furthermore, the stochastic process in chatter conditi s appears to be more anti–persistent (smaller αtop). More detailed information is presented in Tab. 1, where apart from the complexity results ∆α and αtop we show the average value yF , standard deviation σy and kurtosis kury of the examined thrust force component Fy. These statistical measures simply report the increase in force with increasing cutting depth and oscillation amplitude with the similar trend but showing a fairly larger jump between the cutting depth d = 1.75 mm (the case 3) and 2.30 mm (the case 4). Interestingly the kurtosis shows the non-monotonous change of the statistical distributions of Fy. Starting from the cutting depth d = 0.50, 1.00, 2.30, and 2.80 mm the distribution is platykurtic - more flat than the random Gauss distribution (kury =2.815, 2.591, 2.661, 2.714 < 3, respectively), while for d = 1.75 mm we observe the leptokurtic (kury > 3, more spiky than the Gaussian) distribution with kurtosis kury reaching a value of 3.40. Thus it is the largest discrepancy from the monotonic tendencies and may signal intermittency at d = 1.75 mm. It should be also noted that the actual cutting depth d as well as shaft angular velocity were not constant but can be considered as the averages. In the future studies we plan to explain the role of other turning parameters on the complexity of the system response.   Table 1. Summary of the multifractal and statistical analyses     615. VIBRATIONS IN STAINLESS STEEL TURNING: MULTIFRACTAL AND WAVELET APPROACHES. GRZEGORZ LITAK AND RAFAŁ RUSINEK    VIBROENGINEERING. JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING.   MARCH 2011. VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1. ISSN 1392-8716 105  Fig. 2. (a) Multifractal bands of the three chosen cases (2)–(4) from the Fig. 1b. (b) The complexity diagram αtop versus ∆α with all examined process denoted by numbers (1)–(5) (as in Fig. 1b).    Wavelet analysis  For the Fy time series given by Fy(i), with i = 1, 2, 3,…, N, the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) with respect to a wavelet  ψ(η) is defined as follows:      (2)  where yF  and σy are the averages and standard deviations (see Tab. 1). The wavelet ψ(η) is referred to as the mother wavelet, and the letters s and i, n denote the scale and the time indices, respectively. The wavelet power spectrum (WPS) of the Fy time series is defined as the square modulus of the CWT:         (3)  In our calculations, we have used a complex Morlet wavelet as the mother wavelet. A Morlet wavelet consists of a plane wave modulated by a Gaussi n function and is described by  615. VIBRATIONS IN STAINLESS STEEL TURNING: MULTIFRACTAL AND WAVELET APPROACHES. GRZEGORZ LITAK AND RAFAŁ RUSINEK    VIBROENGINEERING. JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING.   MARCH 2011. VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1. ISSN 1392-8716 106       (4) where 0θ  is the center frequency, also referred to as the ord r of the wavelet. The value of 0θ  controls the number of oscillations in the wavelet and thus controls the time/frequency resolutions. In our analysis, we used 0θ = 6. This choice provides a good balance between th  time and frequency resolutions. Also, for this choie, the scale is approximately equal to the period, and therefore the terms scale and period can be interchanged for interpreting the results.   Fig. 3. Wavelet power spectra PW for different cutting depths d = 1.00, 1.75, 2.30 for a, b, and c; respectively (cases (2)-(4) in Figs. 1b and 2b). The colours are related to the magnitudes of PW(s, n) according to the logarithmic scale log2 (see right panels marked with the corresponding scale exponents). The total measurement time of N =1500 samplings is related to 0.75 sec.  615. VIBRATIONS IN STAINLESS STEEL TURNING: MULTIFRACTAL AND WAVELET APPROACHES. GRZEGORZ LITAK AND RAFAŁ RUSINEK    VIBROENGINEERING. JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING.   MARCH 2011. VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1. ISSN 1392-8716 107 The reader is referred to [7,10,11] for further details on the wavelet analysis methodology. The wavelet power spectra (WPS) of the Fy time series for the cutting depth d = 1.00, 1.75, and 2.30 mm related to the chatter growing are depicted in Figs. 3a-c (d = 1.00, 1.75, 2.30 mm - cases (2)-(4) in Figs. 1b, 2a). Note that the slow vibration enhancement in all figures indicate the characteristic period in a vicinity of 150–160 sampling intervals which corresponds to the frequency of 12.5–13.3 Hz. This frequency is a consequence of the rotational speed of a workpiece, which was about 780 rpm. Evidently the workpiece was not ideally balanced. Furthermore, in Fig. 3a and b (d = 1.00 and 1.75 mm) we observe the growing role of intermittent (short time intervals) vibrations of about 32–100 sampling intervals (of about 20–62 Hz). These oscillations increase frequency range (decrease period) with increasing d (Figs. 3a-b). For d = 2.3 mm they form a more continuous response reaching the length 900 sampling intervals (0.45 sec.). This is a manifestation of the well-developed chatter vibrations with the frequency of about 46 Hz. Besides, growing role of very short oscillations with the period of about 2-3 sampling intervals (corresponding 0.7–1.0 kHz).  Summary and Conclusions  In summary we will note that by examining turning time series of the thrust force by different methods we not only identified chatter vibrations but followed its development. Starting from small cutting depth we observed more regular vibrations related to the rotational speed (of about 13 Hz) caused by unbalanced effects. By increasing cutting depth we found the intermittent vibrations of about 20–62 Hz, which appeared to be more continuous frequency component in the cutting depth d = 2.30 mm (concentrated at about 46 Hz). Note that this effect was clearly observed by wavelets. Simultaneously, we checked that other measures like the non-monotonously growing standard deviation, and more interesting nontrivial dependences of kurtosis and multifractal parameters were sensitive to that transition. We claim that the evolution of the vibration towards fairly large amplitude unwanted chatter with the increasing cutting depth coincides with lowering of the complexity and the intermittency phenomenon with the maximum of kurtosis. Furthermore, the turning process in the catter conditions appears to be more anti–persistent than the process in a non-chatter regime. The appearance of chatter in the larger cutting depth implies the frictional character of vibrations [2,5,7]. However, to tell more about thematerial role in chatter generation we need to perform more systematic turning tests. On the other hand, the delay mechanism of chatter [1,6] can be ruled out account for visible relative decreasing of the vibration amplitude (for increasing d) related to the speed of the workpiece (about 13 Hz in Fig. 3). We are also planning to examine oscillations of 3D forces including the Fx and Fz components (Fig. 1a).  Acknowledgements  The financial support of Structural Funds in the Operational Programme - Innovative Economy (IE OP) financed from the European Regional Development Fund - Project ”Modern material technologies in aerospace industry”, No. POIG.01.01.02-00-015/08-00 is gratefully acknowledged. GL would like to thank prof. Stefano Lenci for hospitality during his stay in Ancona supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), FP7 - REGPOT - 2009 - 1, under grant agreement No. 245479.   615. VIBRATIONS IN STAINLESS STEEL TURNING: MULTIFRACTAL AND WAVELET APPROACHES. GRZEGORZ LITAK AND RAFAŁ RUSINEK    VIBROENGINEERING. JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING.   MARCH 2011. VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1. ISSN 1392-8716 108 References  [1]  Altintas Y.  Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000). [2]  Gradisek J., Govekar E., Grabec I. Time series analysis in metal cutting: chatter versus chatter-free cutting. Mech. Syst. Signal. Process. 12, 839–854 (1998). [3] Gradisek J., Govekar E., Grabec I. Using coarse-grained entropy rate to detect chatter in cutting. J. Sound. Vibr. 214, 941–952 (1998) [4]  Litak G., Rusinek R., Teter A. Nonlinear analysis of experimental time series of a straight turning process. Meccanica, 39, 105–112 (2004). [5]  Wiercigroch M.  Chaotic vibration of a simple model of the machine tool-cutting process system. J. Vibr. Acoust. 119, 468–475 (1997). [6] Stepan G. Modelling nonlinear regenerative effects in metal cutting. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A359, 739–757 (2001). [7]  Sen A. K., Litak G., Syta A. Cutting process dynamics by nonlinear time series and wavelet analysis, Chaos 17, 023133 (2007). [8]  Goldberger A. L., Amaral L. A. N., Glass L., Hausdorff J. M., Ivanov P. Ch., Mark R. G., Mietus J. E., Moody G. B., Peng C.-K., Stanley H. E. Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation E101, 215–220 (2000) and the software on the web site http://www.physionet.org/physiotools/multifractal/(20 Sep. 2010). [9] Litak G., Geca M., Yao B.-F., Li G.-X. Indicated mean effective pressure oscillations in a atural gas combustion engine. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung 64a, 393–398 (2009). [10]  Torrence C. and Compo G. P. A practical guide to wavelet analysis, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 79, 61–78 (1998). [11] Kumar P. and Foufoula-Georgiou E. Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications, Rev. Geophys. 35, 385–412 (1997). 

Vibrations in stainless steel turning: multifractal and wavelet approaches

https://www.extrica.com/article/10446/pdf

Vibrations in stainless steel turning: multifractal and wavelet approaches

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

JVE International