CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
Authors
Paul Bassett
M. Bednar
+29 more
S. Blum
Vera Bril
R. Carne
Alexa Cleasby
David R. Cornblath
J. Demeestere
Billie L. Durn
C. D’Amour
K. George
K. Gross-Paju
Hans Peter Hartung
R. Henderson
T. Kalous
P. Kunc
S. Larue
John Philip Lawo
Richard A. Lewis
Ingemar S.J. Merkies
Orell Mielke
L. Roberts
I. Rubanovits
A. Sabet
Gens Sobue
J. Sussova
R. Talab
T. Toomsoo
M. Valis
P. Van Damme
Ivo N. van Schaik
Publication date
1 September 2020
Publisher
Barrow - St. Joseph\u27s Scholarly Commons
Abstract
© 2020 CSL Behring. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Peripheral Nerve Society. The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study required subjects with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to show dependency on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and then be restabilized on IgG before being randomized to placebo or one of two doses of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Nineteen of the 51 subjects (37%) randomized to placebo did not relapse over the next 24 weeks. This article explores the reasons for this effect. A post-hoc analysis of the PATH placebo group was undertaken. A literature search identified other placebo-controlled CIDP trials for review and comparison. In PATH, subjects randomized to placebo who did not relapse were significantly older, had more severe disease, and took longer to deteriorate in the IgG dependency period compared with those who relapsed. Published trials in CIDP, whose primary endpoint was stability or deterioration, had a mean non-deterioration (placebo effect) of 43%, while trials with a primary endpoint of improvement had a placebo response of only 11%. Placebo is an important variable in the design of CIDP trials. Trials designed to show clinical improvement will have a significantly lower effect of this phenomenon than those designed to show stability or deterioration
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Barrow - St. Joseph's Scholarly Commons
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:scholar.barrowneuro.org:ne...
Last time updated on 18/03/2021