Natsis, K.

Totlis, T.

English

Via Medica Journals

Folia Morphol. Vol. 70, No. 3, p. 211Copyright © 2011 Via MedicaISSN 0015–5659www.fm.viamedica.plL E T T E R   T O   T H E   E D I T O R211Dear EditorWe read the interesting article on suprascapular notch morphology and distance from the glenoidcavity in a Kenyan population by Sinkeet et al. [1]. Both in the text and in Tables 4 and 5 the authors reportthat Natsis et al. [2] studied the suprascapular notch morphology in Greek scapulae, whereas in the Mate-rials and Methods section of our article it is clearly stated that our study was carried out in scapulae fromthe Department of Anatomy, University of Cologne, Germany. Moreover, in Table 4 they mention that theamount of scapulae studied in our article was 400, while we studied 423 scapulae [2].Yours sincerely,Konstantinos Natsis and Trifon TotlisDepartment of Anatomy, Medical School,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GreeceReferences1. Sinkeet SR, Awori KO, Odula PO, Ogeng’o JA, Mwachaka PM (2010) The suprascapular notch: its morphology anddistance from the glenoid cavity in a Kenyan population. Folia Morphol, 69: 241–245.2. Natsis K, Totlis T, Tsikaras P, Appell HJ, Skandalakis P, Koebke J (2007) Proposal for classification of the suprascapularnotch: a study on 423 dried scapulas. Clin Anat, 20: 135–139.The suprascapular notch: its morphologyand distance from the glenoid cavityin a Kenyan population

The suprascapular notch: its morphology and distance from the glenoid cavity in a Kenyan population

https://journals.viamedica.pl/folia_morphologica/article/download/19306/15199

The suprascapular notch: its morphology and distance from the glenoid cavity in a Kenyan population

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Via Medica Journals