Progress in Deciphering the Minoan Script
A Note on The History of The Liturgy in The Lutheran Church In Hungar

Arndt, William F.

Jἀnossy, Lajos

English

Concordia Seminary, St. Louis: Scholarly Resources

Concordia Theological Monthly Volume 25 Article 15 3-1-1954 Brief Studies William F. Arndt Concordia Seminary, St. Louis Lajos Jἀnossy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm  Part of the Practical Theology Commons Recommended Citation Arndt, William F. and Jἀnossy, Lajos (1954) "Brief Studies," Concordia Theological Monthly: Vol. 25, Article 15. Available at: https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm/vol25/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Print Publications at Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Concordia Theological Monthly by an authorized editor of Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. For more information, please contact seitzw@csl.edu. BRIEF STUDIES PROGRESS IN DECIPHERING THE MINOAN SCluPT An archaeological fact many of us remember from our school days is that Sir Arthur Evans, an English scholar, in 1896, when he was cxavating at Knossos on the Isle of Crete, found documents written on clay which represented 11 totally unknown system of writing and in all probability an equally unknown language. Our kind teachers perhaps used the ocC11Sion to point out that not all worlds as yet bad been conquered and that there were still some problems to be solved by the rising generation. When Evans analyzed the documents, he saw that there were three kinds of writing: one was definitely hieroglyphic, the second somewhat cursive, and the third a modifi-cation of the second. The tablets were copied and photographed, but nobody could read them. Archaeologists and professional philologiaos occupied themselves more or less with this material, but no one, in spite of many guesses, could present a solution. Now, however, some progress is being made in the reading of this script. What we ought to have at our disposal to make out the words in this strange script is a double document, one part containing the strange characters, the other 11 translation of rhe material in 11 language that is known to us. In that way, it will be recalled, the hieroglyphia of Egypt were deciphered. At Rosetta, near Alexandria, a stone was found in 1799 which is now always referred to as the Rosetta stoDC; it contained an inscription in three scripts: in hieroglyphia, io the script of the ordinary people (called demotic), and a uanslation in Greek, written in ordinary Greek characters. The Greek could be ttad without much difficulty; soon the demotic script could be made out roo; and finally, owing especially to the brilliant work of Champollioo, the key was furnished for hitherto undecipherable hieroglyphia. Unfortunately no bilingual inscription or document has been found to aid scholars in the reading of the Minoan, that is, the Cretan script. (Minos, so the old writers say, was an eminent Cretan king who resided at Knossos). An important step forward was made whco Professor Carl Blegen of Cincinnati, excavating at various times sioce 1939 in Pylos, the city of old Homeric Nestor on the west coast of the Peloponnesus, found 11 number of tablets in the Minoan script which promise to give us important help. The date of these tablm is roughly 1200 B. C. and earlier. Knossos on Crete was desuoyed in 1400 B. C., but, u we learn now, the script which had been employed there wu used on the continent of Greece for centuries later. An Eog• 230 1Arndt and J?nossy: Brief StudiesPublished by Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary, 1954BIJlll fflJDDIS 281 Jisb IUdutea by the name of Michnel Ventris adopted Greek nnd Cretan archaeology as a hobby after he as 11 boy hnd heard Evans Jec-hll'C on the undecipbered Minoan tnblets. In his leisure hows he studied all he could about these inscriptions, and he hns mnde a remark-able cliscovery. Examining the inscriptions of Pylos, where Greek was spoken, be found thnt the Minoan script was used to write Greek words. Other scholars did subsidinry work which he was able to use. As had been suspected, Minoan script is based on the system of writ-ing which we call syllabic, that is, 11 sign represents a consonant and a vowel, in other words, a complete syllnble. Venuis, through careful comparison, especially through the scrutiny of proper names thnt he and others had been able to identify, hns discovered a number of Greek words in the Pylos inscriptions. We therefore know now the phonetic value of mnny of the signs occurring in this script. From the little that has been snid here it is dear thnt the Minoan script hu not as yet been solved; that is, the Minonn language itself is Still a mystery to us, but we hnve learned at lenst what the sound value of a number of signs is and by and by through further compnrison and study probnbly the Minoan langunge itself will be brought before us and interpreted. The work done by Ventris nod others is all the more astounding because, as mentioned above, whntever was accom-plished was done without the o.id of bilingual texts. The information submitted most sketchily in these few pnragraphs wu dwelt on in a brilliant illustrated a.nicle written by R. D. Bnrnett, deputy keeper of the Depnrtment of Egyptinn and Assyrian Antiquity at the British Museum, and published in the Manchosler Gttardian 'Wttily for October 15, 195~. Inasmuch as 1111 progress nlong these lines will help us better to undersmnd archaeological and ling\listic matters conneacd with the Holy Scriptures, theologians will welcome what is here reponcd. WILLIAM F. ARNDT A NOTE ON THB HISTORY OF THB LITURGY IN THE LUTHERAN CHURCH IN HUNGARY (NOTB: The Rev. Prof. Dr. Lajos Janossy, Sopron, Hungary, is one of die oursrudiog Lutheran liturgiologists in Cenual Europe. llecendy the under-signed had cxasion to request information from Professor Janossy concerning rhe use of wsaneoa in the Church of the Augsburg Confession in Hungary. Professor Jlnoay replied with the paragraphs here reproduced. We share them in tn.mlacecl form with our readers in view of the extensive information which theJ furnish conterning a development in Lutheranism on which little infor-macion is anilable in English.-AltTHUll CAllL PIBPKOllN.) The pure Gospel recovered by the Lutheran Reformation rapidly made a triumphnnt conquest throughout Hungary. In all three pans 2Concordia Theological Monthly, Vol. 25 [1954], Art. 15https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm/vol25/iss1/15BllIBP STUDIES of the Hungarian Empire- in the so-called Kingdom of Hunguy; in the areas occupi d by the Turks; as well as in Erdcly-Transylvania in the Eastern part of the country, which was just gradually developing into an independent Hungarian principality- the Lutheran Reforma-tion brought about a renovation of the Church in the Apostolic Gospel In line with her conservative attitude and nature, the rich liturgial life of the Hungarian Church, thus renewed according to the standards of the Wittenberg Reformation, continued with new power, purity, and an ever more extensive use of the vernacular. On the basis of the sources one must emphasize as strongly as possible that an overwhelm-ing proponion - approximately eighty per cent-of the Hungarian. that is. Magyar, population of the Hungarian empire had adopted the Lutheran Reformation as enthusiastically as had the minority groups that had settled among us: the Germans, the Slovaks, the Croatians, and so fonh. In the cities and towns where the whole population became Lutheran the Church buildings were left for the most pm unchanged. Even the retention of several altars was not infrequent. On Sundays and other holy days-a total of eighty-five were observed annually- the purified Evangelical Lutheran Mass was celebrated in the morning at the high altar. It was preceeded in the early morning by matins or lauds, and vespers were sung in the late afternoon. Mom-ing and evening services were likewise conducted on nonfesrival week-days. Candles, paraments, the colorful Mass vestments at the Holy Eucharist, the surplice, with stole [when appropriate], at non• Eucharistic offices, and sometimes even incense, continued in use. In the 60's and 70's of the sixteenth century 80 to 85 per cent of the entire population of the Hungarian Empire were Evangelia! Lutheran! Before the renovated Church in Hungary could achieve a constiN• tionally recognized status and an independent organization, the papal hierarchy, assisted and re-enforced by the new Hapsburg dynasty, began a programmatic persecution. Simultaneously the so-called "Helvetic orientation" forced its way into Hungary during the decades referred to and began to infect the Hungarian Church, on one hand as Zwinglianism, on the other as Melanchthonianism, then as crypto-Calvinism, still later as a mild form of open Calvinism, and finally as Calvinistic Puritanism. Thus from the middle of the sixteenth century the Evangelical Lutheran Church had to defend herself on a number of fronts. Our forebears. who constituted a predominant majority in the Hungarian Diet as early as 1548, were still hoping that King Milcsa I [Maximilian] would bring about a comprehensive 3Arndt and J?nossy: Brief StudiesPublished by Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary, 1954am mmms 288 reformation without breaching the unity of the ecclesiastical organism The mult wu that they neglected the splendid chance of securing the &eedom and the independence of the Evangelical Lutheran Church OD a constitutional basis under King Miksa. The regional synods of the sixteenth century occupied themselves with establishing for smaller or larger territories of the country the pure doctrine and with the ordering of congregational life. Under these circumstances it was possible for the papal archbishop of Esztergom in the single year 1559 to drive out more than ~00 Evangelical Lutheran rectors of parishes in the western and orthern parts of the empire, that is, the Kingdom of Hungary, and to deprive the Evangelical Lutheran Church of a like number of church buildings. Nevertheless, in the more than 2,000 parishes in which we were able to keep possession of the parish churches, the liturgical life of the Evangelical Lutheran Church continued in full vigor. Even in the purely Magyar parishes our priests wore the full liturgical vesture at the Holy Eucharist-amice, [girdled] alb, manip~e. stole, and chas-uble-and at non-Eucharistic offices and services the surplice, with or without the stole [according to circumstances]. This is amply demonstrated by visitation records from the latter decades of the six-teenth century, as well as by the Articles of Murany of 1596, the Articles of the Synods of Rozsny6 of 1592 and 1604, the Articles of the Magyar Congregational Order of Sopron of 1669, and the Con• gregational Order of Sarvar of 1576. Of particular interest in this connection is the letter of vocation which the council of the royal free city of Kassa in Upper Hungary issued in 1559 to the new Hungarian preacher and chaplain, the Reverend Janos Petho. Under the terms of this letter he was to cele-brate High Mass every other Sunday in the parish church of St. Eliza-beth in Hungarian in full Mass vestments "according to the colors of the season," that is, according to the church year, and on the inter• veoiog Sunday he was likewise to conduct High Mass in Hungarian, again in full liturgical vestmenu, in St. Michael's Chapel, since on these Sundays Mass was celebrated in German in the parish church. In 10me pans of the country the population was divided between adherents of the Roman Catholic religion ,and adherents of the Lu• theran religion. Where in such communities the .parish church was oot available for use by the Lutherans and our Evangelical Lutheran services had to be held in an emergency chapel or privately in the homes of individual members, or where we·were robbed of our Evan-4Concordia Theological Monthly, Vol. 25 [1954], Art. 15https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm/vol25/iss1/15284 Bllil!P snmms gelical Lutheran churches, the Magyar Lutheran clergymen wore only albs or surplices, both of which could still be obtained quire easily. In 1610 :it the synod of Zsolna [Silein] three Evangelical Lutheran dioceses were erected in northwestern Hungary. C:mon VI of this synod dispenses the M11n11r priestS "for certain and evident reasons" from wearing the alb. We must remember that at this period the "Helvetic orientation" wu creeping in from the strictly Magyar ter-ritories into these ten counties of Upper Hungary, especially in the Danube district. The CalvioistS were prqpagandizing energetically against liturgical vestmentS, p:articularly against Mass vestments, and our clergy in th se congregations were often slandered as being Papists. Where the Magy:ar parishes were able to escape such dan-gers, for instance, in Western Hungary, in the counties of Soproo, Gyor, V35, and Zala, notably under the patronage of the Counts of the Nadasdy line, our Evangelical Lutheran Church retained and used at her services in hundreds of purely Magyar p:arishes the magnificent "festal vesture" of historic Christianity-amice, [girdled] alb, man-iple, stole, and chasuble at Mass, and surplice, with stole [when appro-priate], at other services. With reference to vestments, the Evangelical Lutheran episcopal visitation records from the years 1631 to 1642 show that there were still more than three hundred Hungarian Lu-theran parishes in which our cleg.ry were wearing Mass vesrmenrs according to the old prescription. With the apostasy of Count Thomas Nadasdy in 1643 we lost more than two hundred p:arishes and parish churches, and more than forty thousand Hung:arian Lutheran rural families were coerced at sword's point into accepting the Roman Mass and the Papacy. Nor WllS that the only case. Io that most tragic decade from 1671 ro 1681, in the western part of the Empire (that is, in the so-called Kingdom of Hungary) alone, almost nine hunched Evangelical Lutheran church buildings were forcibly taken away from us. The liturgical life in these areas naturally broke down, and the clergy had to content themselves here and there, in some fomr or mountain fastness or in some private home, with preaching a ser-mon and with administering the Blessed Sacrament as quickly and as simply as possible in the dead of night. In the eighteenth cenrwy the penecution of the Evangelia.I Lu-theran Church was continued, particularly in the areas that had been liberated from the Turks. .&,, late as the period of King Kaiel m and Maria Theresa more than three hundred additional parish churches were srolen from us. When at the end of the eighteenth cenrwy our Church gradually5Arndt and J?nossy: Brief StudiesPublished by Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary, 1954IIIU fflJDIBS BBIS iecovestd her comtitutional liberty, she had unfortunately become an imaiody weak Chwcb that suffered under Reformed, Rationalist, Pu.dun, and Pietist influences and had no positive relationship t0 autbmdc Bvaagelical Lutheran Church life. Thus it happened that there wu no m:overy of liturgical life; that is. no renewal took place. Here and there in a few parishes-chiefly Upper Hungarian urban mogreguioas with mixed Magyar, Slavic, and German constituencies-the wearing of the surplice, at least at the Holy Eucharist, survived. After the dismemberment of the Hungarian Empire in 1920 the use of the surplice within the present boundaries of Hungary was limited m a few plac:a, such as the large Magyar-Slovak congrega-tion in Nyiregyhba and in the large Slovak-Magyar parish in Beke-saaba, but in all these instances the use of the surplice was limited to celebntions of Holy Communion. Narurally, no liturgical revival followed World War D. 5oploo. Huoguy LAJOS JANOSSY 6Concordia Theological Monthly, Vol. 25 [1954], Art. 15https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm/vol25/iss1/15

Brief Studies

https://scholar.csl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3565&context=ctm

Brief Studies

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Concordia Seminary, St. Louis: Scholarly Resources