Wharton, Tim

English

Deirdre Wilson (2018) provides a reflective overview of a volume devoted to the historic application of relevance-theoretic ideas to literary studies. She maintains a view argued elsewhere that the putative non-propositional nature of (among other things) literary effects are an illusion, a view which dates to Sperber and Wilson (1986/1995:224): “If you look at [nonpropositional] affective effects through the microscope of relevance theory, you see a wide array of minute cognitive [i.e., propositional] effects.” Thispaper suggests an alternative, that modern-day humans have two apparently different modes of expressing and interpreting information: one of these is a system in which propositional, cognitive effects dominate; the other involves direct, non-propositional effects. The paper concludes by describing two ways such affects might be assimilated into relevance theory. The first, to accept that humans are much more than merely cognitive organisms; the second, to rethink quite radically what we mean by cognition

University of Brighton Research Portal

Relevance:communication and cognition and ... ?

https://cris.brighton.ac.uk/ws/files/32265889/RCC_and_what_resubmission20220220.pdf

Relevance:communication and cognition and ... ?

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Brighton Research Portal