Bolton, J Stuart

Hong, Kwanwoo

Yum, Kiho

English

Purdue E-Pubs

Purdue UniversityPurdue e-PubsPublications of the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories School of Mechanical Engineering3-2005Acoustic Radiation Modes of a Tire on a ReflectingSurfaceKiho YumPurdue UniversityKwanwoo HongPurdue UniversityJ Stuart BoltonPurdue University, bolton@purdue.eduFollow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/herrickThis document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact epubs@purdue.edu foradditional information.Yum, Kiho; Hong, Kwanwoo; and Bolton, J Stuart, "Acoustic Radiation Modes of a Tire on a Reflecting Surface" (2005). Publications ofthe Ray W. Herrick Laboratories. Paper 143.http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/herrick/143Acoustic Radiation Modes of a Tire on a Reflecting Surface Kiho Yum,  Kwanwoo Hong  and  J. Stuart BoltonRay W. Herrick LaboratoriesPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette, Indiana, USALMS User Conference 2005Troy, Michigan, USAMarch 15 -16, 2005Radiation Mode Approach■ Radiation Mode Approach is used in• Active noise control • Source reconstruction• Acoustic design optimization■ Objectives • To implement a radiation mode approach to tire noise radiation by using SYSNOISE ATV function• To identify tire noise generation mechanism■ Problem Definition• Acoustic radiation modes of a rectangular plate • 3-dimensional radiation field characteristics resulting from the tire and ground geometryAcoustic Radiation Modes▶ defined on the surface of the structure.▶ shows the orthogonal characteristics of the radiation field surrounding the structure.▶ acoustic radiation mode identifies the effective radiation region on the structure surface.▶ dependent on geometry of the structure, not on surface velocity distribution of the structure.Acoustic Transfer Vector (ATV)▶ provides base for calculation of the radiation field characteristics.▶ relationship between surface normal velocities (    ) and radiated sound pressure (    ) in frequency domain.▶ dependent on geometry of vibrating surface, field point location and physical properties of acoustic medium.rpbvrATVVbTATV vV rrp =b: boundary surfacer: at one field pointbvrpAcoustic Transfer Vector (ATV)■ Radiation field representation• Helmholtz integral equation• Rayleigh integral equation (baffled plate case)■ Discretization• On the surface:• In far-field:0( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )y yyS SG x yp x x p y dS j v y G x y dSna r w¶= +¶ò òr rr r r r r rbTATV vVp =bTATV vV rrp =b b=Αp Βvr b bp = +T Td p m vpressure & normal velocityon the boundarypressureat a field pointpressure matrix at all field pointson the recovery surfaceT1TTATV mBAdV +=-rATV0( ) ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) ySp x x j v y G x y dSa r w= òr r r r rAcoustic TransferMatrix (ATM)Sound Radiation Mode■ Radiated sound power in far-field▶ :  Radiation Resistance Matrix■ Sound Radiation Mode:  resulting from eigenvector decompositionof radiation resistance matrix▶ normalized eigenvector :  Sound Radiation Mode▶ eigenvalue :  proportional to radiation efficiencyHQ2 *1 10 02 2R Rr r rr rr rp p pW S Sc cr r= == =å å ATV ATV1 02Rb r r br b brW Scr== =åH * THv V V v v Rv*1 02Rr rrrScr==åTATV ATVV VR= HR QΛQΛapply ATV relationshipPlate Radiation Model■ Baffled Plate Radiation Model■ ATV Calculation Approach• Theoretical approach using Rayleigh Theory• Simulation using SYSNOISE (Ver. 5.6) Rayleigh Optionhemisphericalrecovery surface(R7.5)baffled rectangular plate (0.4mX0.24m)( ) ( )( ),0( )2 ,jkr y xnj tSv y ejp x e dSr y xwwrp-= òr rrrr rSound Radiation Modes (320 Hz)• Amplitude visualization• Good match between theory and simulation• Breathing mode is dominant[ theory based ] [ simulation based ]Sound Radiation Modes (960 Hz)• Good match between theory and simulation• Radiation from central region stronger than that from the edge.[ theory based ] [ simulation based ]Eigenvalue of Radiation Modes■ Eigenvalue of each radiation mode• Good match between theory and simulation.• As frequency increases, eigenvalue of each radiation mode increases. Eigenvalue stops increasing and converges at the coincidence frequency.• Eigenvalues are proportional to radiation efficiencies of radiation resistance matrix.[ theory based ] [ simulation based ]Tire Radiation Analysis Procedure[ Direct BEM ]radiation field characteristicsbased on Acoustic Radiation Mode(Acoustic Transfer Vector) SPL & Sound Intensity on a hemisphere surrounding a tireSound Power Radiation EfficiencyRadiation Mode Contribution[ Structural Harmonic FEM ]structural wave propagationbased on surface normal velocitiesTire Radiation Model■ Boundary Element Model• 205/70R14 tire base• Two radiation cases: free space radiation / reflecting surface radiation• Recovery surface: R7.5 sphere (hemisphere) – related to pass-by noise test• For reflecting surface radiation case, the reflecting surface was modeled as rigid.[ free space radiation ] [ reflecting surface radiation ]Radiation BE Analysis■ D-BEM Analysis• Using Direct Collocation Boundary Element Method (D-BEM) in SYSNOISE ver. 5.6• Reason to use D-BEM: D-BEM takes less calculation time and       allows model simplification for the interior singularity problem• Frequency range: 12.5 Hz – 1600 Hz (constant bandwidth 12.5 Hz)■ CHIEF Method• To eliminate the singularity effect in an exterior D-BEM problem, CHIEF points were introduced inside the tire model. • The Number and location of CHIEF points were optimized.Finally 18 CHIEF points were applied.R0.22Sound Radiation Modes (350 Hz)• first and second modes: sidewall and wheel dominant• grouping characteristics: 3rd and 4th, 5th and 6th, 8th and 9th, 10th and 11th• 7th mode: ring like mode[ free space radiation ]treadbandsidewallsidewallSound Radiation Modes (350 Hz)• first and second mode:  similar to free space radiation case but a peak is added in the contact patch area• No grouping characteristic.[ reflecting surface radiation ]point in contact with reflecting surfaceSound Radiation Modes (638 Hz)• first and second modes: sidewall and wheel dominant• grouping characteristics   • oscillating modes which have higher value on the sidewall appear in the lower modes.[ free space radiation ]treadbandsidewallsidewallSound Radiation Modes (638 Hz)• first and second mode:  similar to free space radiation case but a peak is added in the contact patch area• No grouping characteristic [ reflecting surface radiation ]point in contact with reflecting surfaceSound Radiation Modes (950 Hz)• first mode: wheel dominant• oscillating modes which have higher value on the sidewall appear in the lower modes.• treadband is not efficient radiation region [ free space radiation ]treadbandsidewallsidewallSound Radiation Modes (950 Hz)• similar to free space radiation case but a peak is added in the contact patch area.• 3rd – 5th modes: high radiation region on contact patch area[ reflecting surface radiation ]point in contact with reflecting surfaceRadiation Efficiency of Radiation Modes■ Radiation efficiency of each radiation mode for a unit surface normal velocity: proportional to eigenvalue of radiation resistance matrix[ free space radiation ]02 nnbWE cSlsr= =• Radiation modes in same group have equal radiation efficiencies. • Radiation efficiencies of 1st and 2nd modes are higher than other modes.• As frequency increases, radiation efficiency of each radiation mode increases.Radiation efficiency stops increasing and converges at the coincidence frequency.  Radiation Efficiency of Radiation Modes• Grouping characteristic does not appear.  • Radiation efficiencies of 1st and 2nd modes are higher than other modes.• Big difference from the free space radiation- Radiation efficiencies of 3rd, 4th and 5th modes increases above 800Hz.[ reflecting surface radiation ]strong radiation region from the contact patch area: Horn EffectStructural FE Analysis■ Tire FE model■ Structural Harmonic Analysis• Full matrix method was performed using ANSYS ver. 7.1. • Harmonic point source was applied at the point in contact with the ground.• Frequency range: 12.5 Hz – 1600 Hz (constant bandwidth 12.5 Hz)• Shell elements were used.• To consider stiff belt and rubberized carcass, orthotropic material properties wereapplied on treadband and sidewall.• Wheel and boundary between wheel and tire were modeled as rigid.• inflation pressure: 30 psiOrthotropic Material Properties• adapted from the work of Kropp [1989] and Pinnington and Briscoe [2002] or based on physical reasoning, or obtained by direct measurement at Continental Tire.treadbandcircumferential Young’s modulus 750 MPasidewallcircumferential Young’s modulus 7.5 MPacross-sectional Young’s modulus 320 MPacross-sectional Young’s modulus 50 MPashear modulus 50 MPa shear modulus 1.5 MPaPossion’s ratio 0.45 Possion’s ratio 0.45density 1200 kg/m3 density 800 kg/m3inflation pressure30 psi (207 kPa)Structural Wave Propagation■ Circumferential Wave Number Decompositionstructural velocity distribution in space domainflexural wave longitudinal wave ring mode(ring frequency)structural velocity distribution in wave number domaincut-on freqof flexural wave modem=3m=5m=7m=1Power Calculation■ Structural input powerproportional to space-averaged meansquare velocity. where      : tire surface area■ Radiated sound powercalculated at field points on the recovery surface by using D-BEM directly. ■ Sound Radiation Characteristics– Strong contribution to sound radiation results from the structural waves with low wave number.– Sound amplification appear above 800 Hz: Horn Effect20 b bE cS vr=bS1Re[ ]Rr r rrW p v S==åring frequencycut-on frequency of flexural wave modeMatching of Radiation Modesny[ free space radiation ] [ reflecting surface radiation ]ring frequency■ Matching of radiation mode and structural velocity distribution: • It shows the relationship between radiation modes and structural velocity on tire surface.• All radiation modes do not match with structural velocities. • The radiation mode which has a nodal line on the center circumference or on the cross-section including the point in contact with the ground can be neglected.21 1N Nb b n n nn nW W yl= == = = =å åH H Hv QΛQ v y ΛySound Power Contribution of Radiation Modes[ free space radiation ] [ reflecting surface radiation ]ring frequency■ Sound power contribution of each radiation mode when combined with structural velocities • All radiation modes do not contribute to the sound radiation. • Reflecting surface radiation: 3rd mode is dominant above 800 Hz (Horn Effect Characteristic)21 1N Nn n nn nW y Wl= == = =å åHy ΛyCumulative Sound Power Curve• Free space radiation: 7th radiation mode, a ring-like mode on the treadband, contributes more than 90 percent of the radiated power at the ring frequency.• Reflecting surface radiation: 3rd mode’s contribution is over 70 % above 800 Hz.[ free space radiation ] [ reflecting surface radiation ]Radiated Sound Power[ free space radiation ] [ reflecting surface radiation ]■ Sound Power Calculation- direct calculation: - radiation mode summation:• Good match below 1 kHz between direct calculation and radiation mode summation.• Radiation mode summation method can be used in sound power calculation. • If the radiation modes are known, it can reduce the time to calculate the sound power.  21 1N Nb b n n nn nW W yl= == = = =å åH H Hv QΛQ v y Λy1Re[ ]Rr r rrW p v S==åConclusions• Radiation mode approach for the rectangular plate model and the tire model was implemented by using Acoustic Transfer Function (ATV) in SYSNOISE.• Radiation mode approach can help us to identify the radiated noise generation mechanism.• Specifically, the radiation characteristics of a three-dimensional tire model in contact with a reflecting surface and enclosed by a hemispherical recovery surface was estimated by using acoustic radiation modes and by comparison with free-space radiation.• The third radiation mode above 800 Hz is principally responsible for the horn effect in the presence of reflecting surface.• The significance of the fast, longitudinal wave mode propagating through the treadband was confirmed by the large contribution of the modified ring radiation mode to the radiated sound power at the tire’s ring frequency.References1. K. Yum and J. S. Bolton, 2004, “Sound Radiation Modes of a Tire on a Reflecting Surface,”Proc NOISE-CON 2004, pp. 161-168.2. S. J. Elliot and M. E. Johnson, 1993, “Radiation Modes and the Active Control of SoundPower,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 94(4), pp. 2194-2204.3. K. A. Cunefare and M. N. Currey, 1994, “On the Exterior Acoustic Modes of Structures,” J.Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 96(4), pp. 2302-2312.4. K. A. Cunefare, M. N. Currey, M. E. Johnson and S. J. Elliot, 2001, “The RadiationEfficiency Grouping of Free-Space Acoustic Radiation Modes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol.109(1), pp. 203-215.5. M. Tournour, P. Brux, et al., 2003, “Inverse Numerical Acoustics of a Truck Engine,” SAEPaper 2003-01-1692.6. F. Martinus, D. W. Herrin and A. F. Seybert, “Practical Considerations in Reconstructingthe Surface Vibration using Inverse Numerical Acoustics,” SAE Paper 03NVC-113.7. 2000, SYSNOISE Rev 5.5: User Manual, LMS International.8. H. A. Schenck, 1968, “Improved Integral Formulation for Acoustic Radiation Problems,” J.Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 44(1), pp. 41-58.

Acoustic Radiation Modes of a Tire on a Reflecting Surface

https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&context=herrick

Acoustic Radiation Modes of a Tire on a Reflecting Surface

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Purdue E-Pubs