This paper discusses the importance of research design and indicators’ selection
to facilitate the assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). From
this perspective, it feeds the discussion on the need of relevant indicators for
monitoring SDGs. It provides a starting point of what can be done to strengthen
the scientific underpinning of sustainability indicators.
It leverages on findings of authors’ previous empirical studies on SDG indicators
and composite indexes. These studies call for some shifts in the SGDs agenda in
order to avoid the great risk to misallocate development investments.
The first shift derives from the incompatibilities of some SGDs indicators. In
particular, trade-offs occur across SDGs: progress on one the economic pillar
cannot fully offset lack of progress on another (e.g. rising environmental degradation).
This misalignment can be explained referring to the level of analysis of
sustainability: part of the problem is that sustainability cannot be addressed solely
at the national level as complex interactions among political and governmental
levels in complex nested subsystems affect it. This implies a reframing of the
SDG framework and a conceptualization of it at a local level to make it more
locally relevant. Thus, the paper discusses the potential of big data (spatial information
inherent in earth observational data, satellite data, mobile and social media
data, etc.) to supplement traditional indicator