No abstract available.Dissertation (MArch (Prof))--University of Pretoria, 2005.Architectureunrestricte

Roccon, Bernard

Dissertation (MArch (Prof))--University of Pretoria, 2005.No abstract available.Architectureunrestricte

UPSpace at the University of Pretoria

Gautrans sub-URBAN train stationUNIVERSITY OF MArch (Prof)PRETORIAMentor: Mr.. K. BakkerStudy leader : Mr. P. Vosloo.Ermendo Bernard Roccon2015122Gautrans Rapid Rail SystemHatfield sub-station.University of Pretoria etd – Roccon, EB (2003) INDEXCHAPTER 1: BRIEF CHAPTER 2: BASELINE1. Introduction1.1.The site1.2. Climate1.3. History of the Arcadia Primary School1.4. PrecedentsJohannesburg International AirportMetro Mall2. Purpose and strategic objectives2.1. Concept3. a Public transport project4. How wil l Gauteng benefit?5. Station development concepts5.1. Densification5.2 Passenger/ people needs5.3. Land uses6. Development framework7. Accommodation list7.1. Platform screens and doors7.2. Entrances and exits7.3. Passenger information7.4. Ablution facilities7.5.Concessions7.6. Side platform station7.7. Lifts and escalators7.8. Basic construction7.9. The sub structureP1P1P2P2P3P3P4P5P5P5P6P6P6P6P7P7P7P7P7P8P8P8P8P8P9P91 Social issues1.1    Occupant comfort1.1.1.    Lighting and ventilation1.1.2. Noise1.1.3. Views1.1.4. Access to green outside1.2. Inclusive environment1.2.1. Public transportation and routes1.2.2. Circulation zones1.2.3. Toilets1.3    Access to facilities1.3.1. Banking1.3.2. Retail1.3.3. Residential1.3.4. Commercial1.4    Participation and control1.4.1. Environmental control1.4.2. User adaptation1.5 Education, health and safety1.5.1. Education1.5.2. Security2 .Economic issues2.1 Local economy2.1.1. Local contractors2.1.2. Local building material supply2.1.3. Outsource opportunities2.2 Efficiency of use2.2.1 Usable space2.2.2 Occupancy2.2.3 Space use2.2.4 Use of technology2.3 Adaptability and flexibility2.3.1.    Vertical dimensionsP10P10P10P10P10P11P11P11P12P12P12P12P12P13P13P13P13P13P13P13P13P14P14P14P14P14P14P14P14P14P14P14P14University of Pretoria etd – Roccon, EB (2003) 2.3.2. Running costs2.3.3. Maintenance2.3.4. Internal partitions2.3.5. Services2.3.6. Cleaning2.3.7. Insurance, water, energy2.3.8. Disruption and “downtime”2.4   Capital costs2.4.1 Build ability2.4.2 Construction3 Environmental issues3.1 Water3.1.1 Rainwater and water use3.1.2 Run off3.1.3 Planting3.2 Energy3.2.1 Location3.2.2 Ventilation system3.2.3 Heating and cooling system3.2.4 Appliances and fittings3.2.5 Renewable energy3.3 Recycling and reuse3.3.1 Toxic wastes3.3.2 Inorganic waste3.3.3 Construction waste3.4 Site3.4.1 Brownfield site3.4.2 Neighboring buildings3.4.3 Vegetation3.4.4 Manufacturing process3.4.5 Recycled/ reused materialsP15P15P15P15P15P15P15P15P15P15P16P16P16P16P16P16P16P16P17P17P17P17P17P17P17P17P18P18P18P18P18CHAPTER 3: DESIGN1. Activity and axis linesSite plan layout2. Theory for design2.1 introduction2.2 System thinking2.3 Air2.3.1 Wind induced(a) Bernoulli-effect(b) Venturi-effect2.3.2. Stack induced2.4 Identity3. Level thinking3.1. 2nd floor under ground.3.2 .1st floor under ground.3.3. Ground floor.3.4. Main entrance.3.5. Commercial component.3.6. Inter-active conference facility4. Thermal performance4.1 North elevation4.2 West elevationSouth elevationP22P23P24P24P24P25P26P26P26P26P27P29P29P30P30P31P31P32P33P34P35P36University of Pretoria etd – Roccon, EB (2003) List of figures BRIEF Figure 1.1. Proposed Gautrans rail line links.Figure 1.2. LG diagram of the site.Figure 1.3. Sun angle diagram and analysis.Figure 1.4. Photos of the old Arcadia school buildingFigure 1.5. Densification diagram towards the stationFigure 1.6. Cross-section for a typical rail roadFigure 1.7. Diagram illustrating the principles for the                  platform layouts.P1P1P2P3P6P8P8List of figures BASELINE Figure 2.1. Lighting and ventilation sectionsFigure 2.2. Plan explaining views and vertical circulationFigure 2.3. Plan illustrating the green areasFigure 2.4. Plan illustrating the public transport on siteFigure 2.5. Toilet layoutFigure 2.6. Perspective indicating the 1st floor underground.Figure 2.7. Perspective indicating the commercial level.Figure 2.8. Perspective illustrating minimum height levels.Figure 2.9. Section illustrating ventilation and coolingcycles.Figure 2.10. an illustration of a heat pump cycle.P10P11P11P11P12P12P13P15P16P17List of figures DESIGN Figure 3.1. Site perspective illustrating axis and linesFigure 3.2. Perspective from south and westFigure 3.3a. Figure section sketch for Pedestrian StreetFigure 3.3b. Perspective of Pedestrian Street.Figure 3.4. Section through Grosvenor Street.Figure 3.5. Diagram explaining shortest routeFigure 3.6. Figure explaining wind directions.Figure 3.7. Figure illustrating the Bernoulli effect.Figure 3.8. Figure explaining the Venturi effectFigure 3.9. Perspective explaining internal air movement.Figure 3.10. Figures explaining the swivel panels &                    construction.Figure 3.11. Plan illustrating the interpolation of grids.Figures 3.12. Elevation design aspects.Figure 3.13. Section from north to south illustrating the                    2nd floor under ground.Figure 3.14. Layout plan of 2nd floor under ground.Figure 3.15. Section from north to south illustrating the                    1st floor under ground.Figure 3.16. Layout plan of 1st floor under ground.Figure 3.17. Section from north to south illustrating the                    ground floor.Figure 3.18. Ground floor spaces.Figure 3.19. Illustration of vertical ventilation and light                    penetration.Figure 3.20. Perspective view of main entrance.Figure 3.21. Section from east to west in perspective                    illustrating the commercial flank.Figure 3.22. Layout plan of commercial office space and                    perspective of structure.Figure 3.23. Section from east to west in perspective                    illustrating the inter-active flank.Figure 3.24. Layout plan of I-active flank.Figure 3.25. Perspective of modular panels and I-active                    structural components.P22P22P22P22P22P25P25P26P26P26P27P27P28P29P29P30P30P30P31P31P31P31P32P32P32P33University of Pretoria etd – Roccon, EB (2003) 1). Density proposal for 100ha around station.2). Governmental legislation.3). Acts and policies relevant to the station.4). Urban design framework.5). Economic feasibility.6). Risk analysis.List of  ANNEXURE University of Pretoria etd – Roccon, EB (2003) List of  References Integrated Station Functional area Guidelines, Draft 3. September 2002.South African government.2001. Gautrans rapid rail link.http://www.trainconstructions.comCSIR Building and Construction Technology. 2000. Guidelines for HumanSettlement, Planning and Design. CTP Book Printers. Cape Town.National Land Transportation Transition Act. Act 22 of 2000Gautrans Draft Document, 2002. Munitoria, Pretoria.Environmentl Impact Assesment, Proposed Gautrans Rapid Rail Link.LRT Design Criteria. October 2000 (revisewd).Encyclopedia Britannica, 1982.Bentley et al. 1985 Responsive Environments, The Architectural Press, London.Dewar, D., and Uytenbogaardt, RS. 1991. South African Cities: A Manifestofor Change, Cape Town.Trancik, R. 1986. Finding Lost Space, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.,New York.Holm, D. 1983. Energy Conservation in Hot Dry Climates.Greeno, J. 1998. Building Services, Technology and Design.Gibbert, J. 2002.Sustainable Building Assessment Tool.Capra, F. 1996. The Web of Life.West, A.W. 2000. An Exploration of the Natural Ventilation Strategies at the WorldTrade Center in Amsterdam.University of Pretoria etd – Roccon, EB (2003) 

Gautrans sub-urban train station

https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/2263/29855/1/00front.pdf

Gautrans sub-urban train station

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UPSpace at the University of Pretoria