In this paper Modified Alpha Network has been compared with the existing Four Tree Network on the basis of different Performance Parameters

Amardeep Gupta

English

International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering

International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering                                                             ISSN: 2454-4248 Volume: 1 Issue: 1                                                                                                                                                                                                       24 – 25 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 24 IJFRCSCE | June 2015, Available @ http://www.ijfrcsce.org  _______________________________________________________________________________________ Comparison of Bandwidth of MALN with Four Tree (Ft) Network  Amardeep Gupta Head, Department of Computer Sc and IT DAV College,Amritsar   Introduction: In this paper Modified Alpha Network has been compared with the existing Four Tree Network on the basis of different Performance Parameters.  Keywords: MALN, ALN, FT, Performance Parameters, Bandwidth, Probability of Acceptance __________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________ Bandwidth and Probability of Acceptance The parameters Bandwidth and Probability of Acceptance have been evaluated using formulas and the values have been shown in Table 1 and Table 2.  Table 1: Bandwidth comparison of MALN, ALN and FT  Table 2 shows the compared values of Probability of Acceptance of MALN, ALN and FT.     Table 2: Probability of Acceptance comparison of MALN, ALN and FT  Fig 1 and Fig2  compare the values plotted from Table 1and Table 2  Fig 1:  Comparison of Bandwidth of MALN, ALNand FT                  Bandwidth  P req_gen MALN ALN FT 0.1 1.476 0.9798 1.2 0.2 2.735 1.6792 2.1264 0.3 3.818 2.2118 3.0144 0.4 4.755 2.6332 3.8032 0.5 5.571 2.9826 4.5072 0.6 6.285 3.2792 5.1344 0.7 6.911 2.5374 5.696 0.8 7.461 3.7644 6.1968 0.9 7.944 3.9654 6.6432 1.0 8.369 4.1440 7.0416 Probability of Acceptance P req_gen MALN ALN FT 0.1 0.9225 0.6123 0.75 0.2 0.8547 0.5247 0.6645 0.3 0.7954 0.4607 0.628 0.4 0.7430 0.4114 0.5942 0.5 0.6964 0.3728 0.5634 0.6 0.6547 0.3415 0.5348 0.7 0.6171 0.3158 0.5085 0.8 0.5829 0.2940 0.4841 0.9 0.5517 0.2753 0.4613 1.0 0.5231 0.2590 0.4401 International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering                                                             ISSN: 2454-4248 Volume: 1 Issue: 1                                                                                                                                                                                                       24 – 25 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 25 IJFRCSCE | June 2015, Available @ http://www.ijfrcsce.org  _______________________________________________________________________________________  Fig 2:  Comparison of Probability of Acceptance of MALN, ALNand FT  Conclusion It is clear from Fig 1 that the Bandwidth of the proposed MALN is higher than existing ALN and FT, as available paths for packet delivery are more in MALN. Fig 2 shows that the proposed Network has higher values of Probability of Acceptance.  References [1] Bansal P. K., Joshi R. C. and Singh Kuldeep, 1994, “On a Fault-Tolerant Multistage Interconnection Network”, International Journal of Computers and Electrical Engineering, 20 (4), pp. 335-345. [2] Bhuyan L. N., Iyer Ravi R, Akhtar Tahsin, Nanda Ashwani K. and Kumar Mohan, January 1997, ”Performance of Multistage Bus Networks for a Distributed Shared Memory Multiprocessor”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 8 (1). [3] Chalasani S., Raghavendra C. S. and Varma A., 1994, “Fault-Tolerant Routing in MIN-Based Supercomputer”, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 22, pp.154-167. [4] Das C. R. and Bhuyan L. N., August 1985, “Reliability simulation of multiprocessor systems”, Proceedings International Conference on Parallel Processing, pp. 764-771. [5] Gupta A. K. Dally W. J., January-June 2006, “Topology Optimization of Interconnection Networks”, Computer Architecture Letters, 5(1),pp. 10-13. [6] Kamiura N., Kodera T. and Matsui N., October 2000, “Design of a Fault-Tolerant Multistage Interconnection Network with Parallel Duplicated Switches”, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault- Tolerance in VLSI Systems, pp. 143-151.   

Comparison of Bandwidth of MALN with Four Tree (Ft) Network

https://www.ijfrcsce.org/index.php/ijfrcsce/article/download/1884/1924

Comparison of Bandwidth of MALN with Four Tree (Ft) Network

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering