Presentations about digital inclusion in society with main topics on where do we come from, where are we now and where are we going

van Apeldoorn, Nick

English

Breda University of Applied Sciences Portal

What do you see?“Technosociologist”DemandAverage adaptabilityEarly adoptersLagging adoptersTimeDigital CapabilitiesThe digital gap (Apeldoorn, 2022)Where do we come from?Where are we now?Where are we going?Where do we come from?Transport systems become more connected, data-driven, and automated, excluding someWe need to create sustainable and accessible mobility solutions that leave no one behindWe need to know where they struggleTo improve governance and increased cooperation to ensure sustainability and social justice% of groupAffinity for technology interactionAll0 20 40 60 80 100High (>4)Medium (3-4)Low (<3)People w disabilitiesOlder peopleWomenLow educationLow incomeRuralMigrants% of groupBasic digital interference competenceAll0 20 40 60 80 100High (>4)Medium (3-4)Low (<3)People w disabilitiesOlder peopleWomenLow educationLow incomeRuralMigrantsTimeEmotional response+-Customer Journey Mapping(Apeldoorn & Herpen, 2022)Planning the JourneyStarting the JourneyAccess the VehicleDuring the JourneyBefore the JourneyAfter the JourneyTechnology acceptance1. It has to be useful2. It has to be fun3. It has to be easy(Davis, 1989)Where are we now?We need a million less cars on the roadWow that's a lot! What is a million?So, we have to change our mobility behaviourWow dat is kei veel!You can call me a homo-economicusBecause itmakes me feel goodHow can big groups of people think Through gamesAbout place-making? Participatory placemaking through play. =“If it does not feel like a game, it’s not a game”“If it is just a game, than what's its purpose?”“Connect people to each other and the physical, cultural, and social identities to that public space”(Project for public spaces, 2017)I am PanelMaria Tomé Nuez - SpanjeIn real time infographic made by all participants that cancontinue to grow also afterthe workshop.RedesireRolf van Boxmeer – The Netherlands Digital and analogue interactive multiplayer gameGoal: Understand stakeholder desires during (re)development processesBlock by BlockKyle Farrell – The world Using an existing game for placemaking designs with a digital and analogue approachGoal: The user is the expert, use that input and create ownership, Especially among childrenPlanned real spacePlannedDigital spaceCounter spaceProductivespaceLived spacenon playersLived spaceplayers(Apeldoorn & Hollander, 2016 – Based upon Lefebre, 1991)Where are we going?With superior budget, data, programmers and AI, knowledge turns into power. The best AI is in the hands of Tech companiesProgrammers, artificial intelligence specialists and statisticians are rare and expensive. The top half works for GoogleDataInformationKnowledgeWisdomMunicipalities have to built their own Smart city, Google uses, smartphones, thermostats and cars. (Apeldoorn, 2021 – Based upon the DIKW Model)Capitalism versus Surveillance Capitalism(Adam Smit, 1776)Means of productionLabour NaturalresourcesConsumers$$$Profits to ownersData(Apeldoorn, 2021 based upon Zuboff, 2019)“But how smart are you really?”Digital PowerBig techThe public sectorThe wiz kidsThe excludedPower & the digital gap (Apeldoorn, 2022)Where do we come from?Where are we now?Where are we going?Technology defines the horizon and shapes the limitations and what is barely imaginableHow we experienceplaces increasingly shaped by digital realities And who built these digital reality places has power over the experiencesWith risks of privacy, social exclusion, biased AI and less public power.  Resulting in power gaps that will impact how we experience places, and societyBut also. opportunities for inclusion, decentralization of power, placemaking and data driven urban development.  PUBLIC PLAY SPACEDIGNITY DIGIREAL9 112INTERNS“What is the role of built environment specialists in the age of AI that is upon us?”Q&AReferencesApeldoorn, N. & Hollander, J. (2016) Pokémon Go as a productive counter-space.Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008. Harvey, D. 2006. “Space as a keyword”. In David Harvey: A Critical Reader, Edited by: Castree, N. and Gregory, D. Oxford: BlackwellLefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space, trans. Nicholson-Smith, D. (first published in 1974 as La production de l'espace) Oxford: BlackwellZuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. 