Fatmawati. This research axamines The Influences Of Discussion Method
Againist Critical Thinking Student On Taxation Subject (Study In State Of
Vocational School 14 Jakarta). Skripsi, Jakarta: Economics Education Studies
Program, Concentration In Accounting Education, Department Of Economics And
Administration, Faculty Of Economics, State University Of Jakarta. Juni 2013.
This study aimed to find out whether there is a the influences of discussion
method againist critical thinking student on taxation subject (study in state of
vocational school 14 jakarta)
This study aims to determine whether there is the influences of discussion
method againist critical thinking student on taxation subject (study in state of
vocational school 14 jakarta). The research method used experimental method
using a static group comparison.
The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. The research
samples are 64 students and based on the table determining the number of samples,
they are only 55 students. With a composition of 27 students of class X I Accounting
2, which uses discussion method and 28 students of class XI Accounting 3, which
uses lecture variatif.
Data obtained using an instrument is a form of questionnaire with likert scale
for the variable (Critical Thinking). Where the variable X of 43 statements that have
been calibrated validity, a valid statement as many as 36 items are valid and 7 items
are drop. Then reliability process using Cronbach alpha formula. The results of the
X variable reliability of 0.93. This proves that the instrument is valid and reliable.
The data analysis technique used is the test of the difference between two average
(t-test). Test data requirements done liliefors normality test data, test data
homogeneity of test F.
The results of the normality of the data for the variable X
, generating Lvalue
(Lo) of 0.158667 compared to Ltable (Lt) at the 0.05 significance level by the
number of 27 samples is 0.170511, then the Lo < Lt. It means that the data were
normally distributed variable X
1
1
. While normality test data for variable X
,
produces Lvalue (Lo) of 0.1476 compared to Ltable (Lt) at the 0.05 level by the
number of 26 samples is 0.16743, then the Lo < Lt. It means that the data were
normally distributed variable X
.
The results of homogeneity test data is Ftables 1.91 and Fvalue is 1,04. So
2
Fvalue < F table. It means that both the data have a homogeneous variance. Then
test the difference between two average count obtained T-value 5.08 and T-Table is
1.67 then T-value > T-Table. The results of these calculations can provide the
conclusions of this study that there is a difference in critical thinking between
students who uses the discussion method and using lecturer variatif
