To what extent does equity play a role in LLC law? To what extent do courts retain the judicial discretion “to do right and justice” in circumstances in which the LLC statute and the applicable LLC agreement do not otherwise offer an adequate remedy to an aggrieved LLC member or manager? Until recently, the answer to these questions was quite clear: Equity is subordinate to the freedom of contract and the express terms of the agreement governing an LLC. But the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in In re Carlisle Etcetera has upended this basic precept of LLC law and practice. Carlisle suggests that courts need not sheepishly defer to the express terms of an LLC agreement. Instead, where justice dictates a different result, Carlisle suggests that courts retain the equitable power to apply fiduciary standards or recognize other equitable rights or duties, despite the statutorily man-dated freedom of contract under LLC law. Thus, this Article argues that Carlisle represents a true paradigm shift. It inverts the long-assumed supremacy of contract over equity in LLC law. Instead, the freedom of contract must be exercised always in the shadow of equity
