CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Water use of selected cover crop species commonly grown in South African fruit orchards and their response to drought stress
Authors
S Dzikiti
D Mazvimavi
Y Mkunyana
Z Ntshidi
Publication date
1 January 2021
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Doi
Abstract
Cover crops are widely planted in orchards for a variety of reasons. These include suppressing soil erosion, nutrient cycling, phytosanitary purposes, general orchard aesthetics etc. However, there is need to balance these benefits against use of scarce resources such as water and nutrients. Currently no information exists on how different cover crop species use water in orchards and how they cope with drought stress. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the transpiration dynamics of various cover crop types in order to identify species with conservative water use rates. Studied species included: 1) two exotic legumes i.e. Lupine (Lupinus albus L.), and Common vetch (Vicia sativa), 2) three exotic grasses i.e. Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), Rye grass (Lolium perenne), and Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestium) and; 3) grasses that are indigenous to sub-Saharan Africa i.e. African Lovegrass (Eragrostis capensis) and Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana). The crops were planted in pots under controlled greenhouse conditions. Transpiration rates were quantified using miniature stem heat balance sap flow gauges and by manual weighing. Drought stress was imposed by withholding irrigation at selected intervals and the responses were quantified through changes in the water relations of the plants. The study showed that exotic legumes had the highest daily water use which peaked at about 2.4 L per square metre of leaf area per day, followed by exotic grasses at 1.5–2.0 L/m2/d. The indigenous grasses used the least water ranging from 0.8 to 1.2 L/m2/d. The indigenous grasses largely displayed an isohydric response to drought stress by maintaining their leaf water status with increasing soil water deficit. The exotic species, on the other hand, showed risk taking behaviour (anisohydry) wherein both the transpiration and leaf water status decreased sharply as drought stress increased. Consequently, some exotic species failed to recover when stress was relieved. From a water use perspective, this study demonstrates that indigenous grass species are more appropriate as cover crops in South African orchards because of their low transpiration rates and the ability to cope with extended periods of water deficit. © 2021 Elsevier Lt
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
University of the Western Cape Research Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:repository.uwc.ac.za:10566...
Last time updated on 08/10/2022