Vaalikoneet ja rationaalinen päätöksenteko

Abstract

This article analyses the potentially rationalising impact that online voting advice application (VAA) use may have on citizens’ vote choice. In other words, having used a VAA, does the user vote for a candidate which, according to the VAA, best matches her opinion profile. Certain background variables, such as the user’s interest in politics, party identification and socio-economic background can be expected to affect how much VAAs can rationalise user’s vote choice. A simple pre-test post-test quasi-experiment of 292 high school and vocational school students was used to test the hypothesis in connection with the 2006 Finnish Presidential Election. The findings suggest that using a VAA does not significantly improve the rationality of the vote choice for those users who are interested in politics and identify with a political party whereas those who are not interest in politics and do not have a strong party identification may benefit from VAA use. All in all, this study suggests that the rationalising impact of VAA use for vote choice is relatively minor

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions