This watchfulness aim analysis criminal responsibility system on doing an injustice in the field
of traffic and road transport, and to detect applications responbillity according to criminal on
traffic accident doing an injustice and road transport. Method approaches that used in this
watchfulness approaches legislation, that is criminal code; number law 8 year 1981 about
procedure of criminal; number law 22 year 2009 about traffic and road transport. This
watchfulness characteristics descriptife in primary law ingredient and secondary law ingredient,
gatherred by book study and analyzed with law analysis. Criminal responsibility without there
error that is with existence subjek law besides the person (human). that is road administrator. in
rule section 7 verse (1) uu no. 22 year 2009, traffic exertion and road transport in direct service
activity to society is done by government, local government, corporate body, and/or society.
thereby, follow economical author in the event of a doing an injustice as determined in paragraph
273 uu no. 22 year 2009, so side that can the responsibility according to criminal (subject)
criminal that is central government or local government, corporate body, and/or society. in
criminal law theory, criminal responsibility system without this error existence is with system
vicarious liability. criminal that dropped fine criminal
