In this note, we describe shortly time varying Sun-Earth distance in the light of Carmeli metric and compare the result with recent astrometric data. The graphical plot suggests that there should be linear-linear correspondence between Sun-planets distances and their time variation.

Not only that, the prediction made here suggests that Carmeli metric can be the sought after framework in order to describe the astrometric anomaly pertaining to the time varying distance of the Sun-Earth distance, and furthermore there are expected time varying distance effect between the Sun and other planets as well

Christianto, Victor

Science and Religion Dialogue Prints

1  A note on astrometric data and time varying Sun-Earth distance in the light of Carmeli metric*  Vixra reference of this paper: http://vixra.org/abs/1008.0076 Abstract In this note, we describe shortly time varying Sun-Earth distance in the light of Carmeli metric and compare the result with recent astrometric data. The graphical plot suggests that there should be linear-linear correspondence between Sun-planets distances and their time variation.  Introduction Recent astrometric data suggest that there is time variation of Sun-Earth distance at the order of 15 cm/year. [1] This observed effect can shed some light on restriction in astronomy modeling.  In this regard we discuss how this time varying Sun-Earth distance can be explained by virtue of Carmeli metric.[2] In the first section we explain how Carmeli metric can be shown to be derivable from quaternion group, and in turn there are a number of new effects which can be observed as part of Carmeli metric. One obvious advantage from Carmeli metric is that it can be used to derive Tully-Fisher law, which can explain galaxy motion without invoking dark matter.[2] There are other advantages from the viewpoint of clarity of modeling, including that one can expect to explain the presently un-described Earth geochronometry.[4]   FLRW-metric from quaternion group and Carmeli metric  The quaternion algebra is one of the most important and most studied objects in mathematics and physics; and it has natural Hermitian form which induces Euclidean metric. [3]  In this regards Trifonov has obtained that using a natural extension of the structure tensors using nonzero quaternion bases will yield a metric as follows:[3]  ___________  *by V. Christianto, http://www.sciprint.org, email: VictorChristianto@gmail.com 2  ( )( )( )( ) −−−=)(sin)(sin0000)(sin000000002222ϑχητχητητηταβRRg&                                  (1) In order to obtain a closed-FLRW metric, one assume that [3]:  ( ) ,12=RR&ητ                                                                                                                                            (2) Which can be rewritten in the form of a metric:[4]  ( )( ) ,22222 dzdydxRR ++==&ητ                                                                                                       (3) Or  ( )( ) ,22222 Rdzdydxds &ητ−++=                                                                                                       (4) Which in turn this metric can be compared with Carmeli metric:[2]  ,1 222222222 dvdzdydxdvHdRds τ−++=−=                                                                     (5) where τ  symbol denotes inverse of Hubble constant, H. One shall note here that this symbol is given different meaning compared with in equation (4), i.e.:   ( ) .12nHαηττ ==                                                                                                                             (6) One implication of this proposition has been found in [4], that is that there is such a proportionality which can be written as follows:  ( )ητ==2211RRRR&&.                                                                                                                  (7) The aforementioned proportionality corresponds to the observed Earth geochronometry phenomena which can be attributed to an expansion of Earth radius at the order of ~0.166 cm/yr. [4]     3  Plausible explanation of time varying Sun-Earth distance In order to explain time varying Sun-Earth distance, one can use similar analogies, but with introducing a coefficient in order to match with the observed data of Anderson et al. (that is around 15 cm /yr).[1] The virtue of this calculation is that one can also observe the time varying displacement of the other planets too, compared to their distances to the Sun.  Given we accept approximate radius of earth to be around 6367.5 km, or around 6.3675 x 106 meter, and that is why: elongation of metric scale can be estimated to be around: myearmxmcymxmetercymeter /.10607.2/.102607.06367500/166.0 11017 −−−−≈≈ . And that is approximately what one should find in a metrology device in order one can observe the effect of Hubble expansion to SI metric length scale. After conversion, this number amount to: 8.26674 x  10-18 m/sec/m’. Now times this amount with 1.4959 x 1011 m of distance between the Sun and the earth, and we will obtain estimate of displacement per second. After conversion to displacement each year, one gets= 39.0 meter per year of displacement. In order to match this number with the observed, one multiply this number with 1/274, and then one gets: 14.23 cm/year of displacement of the Earth from the Sun. While the value above appears to be a retrodiction compared to the observed value, the virtue here is one gets simplicity of framework to get estimate of displacement for other planets. The proportionality now for the planets could be written instead of (7): orRRRR,2211= && ε.                                                                                                                            (8) ( ).2211 RRRR&&=ε                                                                                                                             (8a) Where the R2 mean distance from planet to the Sun, and R1 mean earth radius respectively. The symbol ε denotes factor 274 to match the observed data. This number in turn can be associated with the well-known fine structure constant, therefore equation (8a) can be rewritten for convenience as follows: ( ),2 2211 RRRR&&= α                                                                                                                          (8b) Where α represents fine structure constant = 1/137,… That would be interesting to observe the actual time-varying distance between other planets to the Sun, in order to verify or refute the aforementioned proposition. The result of the above procedure is presented in the table 1 below.  4  Table 1. calculation of the time varying displacement of planets from the Sun           distance  displcmt   log scale log scale log scale   planet dist( 10^11m) displac(in cm) observd(in cm) dist( 10^11m) displac(in m) observd(in m) mercury 5,7894            5,51    0,7626           0,74      venus 10,9506          10,42    1,0394           1,02      earth 14,9598          14,23  15 1,1749           1,15  1,176   mars 22,7389          21,64    1,3568           1,34      hungarias 31,4006          29,88    1,4969           1,48      asteroid 40,3914          38,43    1,6063           1,58      camilla 47,1233          44,84    1,6732           1,65                      jupiter 77,8358          74,06    1,8912           1,87      saturn 142,7014        135,77    2,1544           2,13      uranus 287,0783        273,14    2,4580           2,44      neptune 450,2896        428,43    2,6535           2,63      pluto 590,9116        562,23    2,7715           2,75      2003ub313 777,9089        740,15    2,8909           2,87       Figure 1. Graphical plot of time varying displacement of planets from the Sun   0,0000100,0000200,0000300,0000400,0000500,0000600,0000700,0000800,0000900,0000mercuryvenusearthmarshungariasasteroidcamillajupitersaturnuranusneptunepluto2003ub313dist( 10^11m)displac(in cm)observd(in cm)5   Figure 2. Graphical plot of distance vs. displacement of various planets   Figure 3. Graphical log-log plot of distance vs. displacement of various planets.    -100,00 200,00 300,00 400,00 500,00 600,00 700,00 800,00 900,00 0,0000 200,0000 400,0000 600,0000 800,0000 1000,0000displac(in cm)observd(in cm)-0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 0,0000 0,5000 1,0000 1,5000 2,0000 2,5000 3,0000 3,5000displac(in cm)observd(in cm)6  Concluding remarks: In this note, we describe shortly time varying Sun-Earth distance in the light of Carmeli metric and compare the result with recent astrometric data. The graphical plot suggests that there should be linear-linear correspondence between Sun-planets distances and their time variation. Not only that, the prediction made here suggests that Carmeli metric can be the sought after framework in order to describe the astrometric anomaly pertaining to the time varying distance of the Sun-Earth distance, and furthermore there are expected time varying distance effect between the Sun and other planets as well.  First revision: 26 aug 2010. 2nd revision: 30 aug. 2010 url: http://www.sciprint.org  url: follow Jesus Christ only at http://www.twitter.com/guidetorepent http://guidetorepent.uphero.com/index.html http://guidetorepent.multiply.com http://message.diigo.com/user/guidetorepent http://Guidetorepent.blogspot.com http://findtheTruthnow.blogspot.com http://evangelismwithsocialmedia.blogspot.com http://www.esnips.com/web/Guidetorepent http://www.esnips.com/web/RepentanceGuide http://www.facebook.com/guidetorepent http://www.twitter.com/vChristianto    References: [1] J.D. Anderson & M.M. Nieto (2009), “Astrometric solar system anomalies,” Relativity in fundamental astronomy. Proc. IAU Symposium no. 261, 2009, arXiv:gr-qc/0907.2469. (9p.) [2] M. Carmeli (1996) “Is galaxy dark matter a property of spacetime?” arXiv: astro-ph/9607142 7  [3] V. Trifonov (2003), “Geometry of the group of nonzero quaternions,” arXiv: physics/0301052; [3a] arXiv: math-ph/0606007. [4] V. Christianto & F. Smarandache (2008), “Kaluza-Klein-Carmeli metric from quaternion space, Lorentz’s force, and some observable,” Progress in Physics vol. 2, url: www.ptep-online.com. Vixra reference: http://vixra.org/pdf/1003.0050v1.pdf [5] V. Christianto & F. Smarandache (2008), “What gravity is: some recent considerations,” Progress in Physics vol. 3, url: www.ptep-online.com. Vixra reference: http://vixra.org/pdf/1003.0015v1.pdf       

A note on astrometric data and time varying Sun-Earth distance in the light of Carmeli metric

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Science and Religion Dialogue Prints