Acknowledgement This research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC, ES/S016120/1). Katie Black collected the data for Experiment 2 while undertaking a Bradshaw-Eagle Undergraduate Research Scholarship from the Applied Vision Association. We would like to thank her, and also Ana Sima, who collected the data for Experiment 1.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Clarke, Alasdair D. F.

Hunt, Amelia R.

Nowakowska, Anna

Attention Perception & Psychophysics

English

PubMed

Some spatial layouts may suit our visual search habits better than others. We compared eye movements during search across three spatial configurations. Participants searched for a line segment oriented 45∘ to the right. Variation in the orientation of distractor line segments determines the extent to which this target would be visible in peripheral vision: a target among homogeneous distractors is highly visible, while a target among heterogeneous distractors requires central vision. When the search array is split into homogeneous and heterogeneous left and right halves, a large proportion of fixations are “wasted” on the homogeneous half, leading to slower search times. We compared this pattern to two new configurations. In the first, the array was split into upper and lower halves. During a passive viewing baseline condition, we observed biases to look both at the top half and also at the hetergeneous region first. Both of these biases were weaker during active search, despite the fact that the heterogeneous bias would have led to improvements in efficiency if it had been retained. In the second experiment, patches of more or less heterogeneous line segments were scattered across the search space. This configuration allows for more natural, spatially distributed scanpaths. Participants were more efficient and less variable relative to the left/right configuration. The results are consistent with the idea that visual search is associated with a distributed sequence of fixations, guided only loosely by the potential visibility of the target in different regions of the scene.</p

Alasdair DF Clarke (9109116)

Anna Nowakowska (369542)

Amelia R Hunt (9109128)

Leicester Research Archive

Visual search habits and the spatial structure of scenes

We compared eye movements during search tasks across three spatial configurations. Participants searched for a line segment oriented 45° to the right. Variation in the orientation of distractor line segments determines the extent to which this target would be visible in peripheral vision: a target among homogeneous distractors is highly visible, while a target among heterogeneous distractors requires central vision. When the search array is split into homogeneous and heterogeneous left and right halves, a large proportion of fixations are ``wasted'' on the homogeneous half, leading to slower search times. We compared this pattern to two new configurations. In the first, the array was split into upper and lower halves. During a passive viewing baseline condition, we observed biases to look both at the top half and also at the hetergeneous region first. Both of these biases were weaker during active search, despite the fact that the heterogeneous bias would have led to improvements in efficiency if it had been retained. In the second experiment, a ``jumbled'' search configuration was used in which patches of more and less heterogeneous line segments were scattered across the search space. This configuration allows for more natural, spatially distributed scanpaths. Participants were both more efficient overall, and less variable, relative to the left/right configuration. The results are consistent with the idea that visual search is associated with a distributed sequence of fixations, guided only loosely by the potential visibility of the target in different regions of the scene

Clarke, Alasdair

Hunt, Amelia

University of Essex Research Repository

Acknowledgement This research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC, ES/S016120/1). Katie Black collected the data for Experiment 2 while undertaking a Bradshaw-Eagle Undergraduate Research Scholarship from the Applied Vision Association. We would like to thank her, and also Ana Sima, who collected the data for Experiment 1.Peer reviewe

Aberdeen University Research

Some spatial layouts may suit our visual search habits better than others. We compared eye movements during search across three spatial configurations. Participants searched for a line segment oriented 45(∘) to the right. Variation in the orientation of distractor line segments determines the extent to which this target would be visible in peripheral vision: a target among homogeneous distractors is highly visible, while a target among heterogeneous distractors requires central vision. When the search array is split into homogeneous and heterogeneous left and right halves, a large proportion of fixations are “wasted” on the homogeneous half, leading to slower search times. We compared this pattern to two new configurations. In the first, the array was split into upper and lower halves. During a passive viewing baseline condition, we observed biases to look both at the top half and also at the hetergeneous region first. Both of these biases were weaker during active search, despite the fact that the heterogeneous bias would have led to improvements in efficiency if it had been retained. In the second experiment, patches of more or less heterogeneous line segments were scattered across the search space. This configuration allows for more natural, spatially distributed scanpaths. Participants were more efficient and less variable relative to the left/right configuration. The results are consistent with the idea that visual search is associated with a distributed sequence of fixations, guided only loosely by the potential visibility of the target in different regions of the scene

PubMed Central

https://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/19205/1/Clarke_etal_APP_Visual_Search_Habits_VoR.pdf

Visual search habits and the spatial structure of scenes

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Leicester Research Archive

University of Essex Research Repository

Aberdeen University Research

PubMed Central