Institute for Economic and Social Research of The Romanian Academy.
Abstract
In contemporary epistemology, recent attempts have been made to resist the
notion of epistemic blame. This view, which I refer to as ‘epistemic blame skepticism,’
seems to challenge the notion of epistemic blame by reducing apparent cases of the
phenomenon to examples of moral or practical blame. The purpose of this paper is to
defend the notion of epistemic blame against a reductionist objection to epistemic blame,
offered by Trent Dougherty in “Reducing Responsibility.” This paper will object to
Dougherty’s position by examining an account in favour of epistemic blame and
demonstrate concerns over the reductionist methodology employed by Dougherty to
argue for his sceptical position
