The central problem in automated planning---action selection---is also a
primary topic in the dialogue systems research community, however, the
nature of research in that community is significantly different from that
of planning, with a focus on end-to-end systems and user evaluations. In
particular, numerous toolkits are available for developing speech-based
dialogue systems that include not only a method for representing states and
actions, but also a mechanism for reasoning and selecting the actions,
often combined with a technical framework designed to simplify the task of
creating end-to-end systems. We contrast this situation with that of
automated planning, and argue that the dialogue systems community could
benefit from some of the directions adopted by the planning community, and
that there also exist opportunities and lessons for automated planning
