CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education
Authors
Merce Garcia-Mila
Sandra Gilabert
Chrysi Rapanta
Publication date
1 December 2013
Publisher
ZU Scholars
Abstract
The need to enhance argument skills through education has become increasingly evident during the past 20 years. This need has resulted in an ongoing discussion that focuses on students\u27 and teachers\u27 argumentation and its support. However, apart from the extended competence-based discourse, no clear and homogeneous definition exists for argumentative competence and its constituent skills. To respond to this deficiency, we conducted an integrative literature review focusing on the methods of argument analysis and assessment that have been proposed thus far in the field of education. Specifically, we constructed an interpretative framework to organize the information contained in 97 reviewed studies in a coherent and meaningful way. The main result of the framework\u27s application is the emergence of three levels of argumentative competence: metacognitive, metastrategic, and epistemological competence. We consider this result the beginning of further research on the psycho-pedagogical nature of argument skills and their manifestation as competent performance. © 2013 AERA
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
ZU Scholars (Zayed University)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:zuscholars.zu.ac.ae:works-...
Last time updated on 03/12/2021