Richmond, Korin

Taylor, Jason

English

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) is increasingly used to evaluate the intelligibility of text-to-speech synthesis (TTS). ASR is less costly than traditional listening tests, but ques- tions remain about its reliability. We re-evaluate the Blizzard Challenge’s intelligibility tasks in English since 2011 using ASR. Re-analysing transcriptions collected by paid in-lab participants, online volunteers and Amazon Mechanical Turkers (the latter used only in 2011), we compare their word error rates (WERs) and statistically-significant system-groupings with those generated by an open-source, Transformer-based ASR model. This ASR model consistently decodes test stimuli with more reliable WERs than the Blizzard Challenge’s (mostly non-native) speech experts and online volunteers. The model also groups systems according to statistical significance similarly to the paid in-lab participants. Using surplus semantically unpredictable sentences (SUS) submitted every year to the challenge, we investigate how confidence intervals in ASR WERs change as the number of transcribed stimuli increases. We plot the Frobenius norm of pairwise significance matrices with increasing stimuli. We find that finer groupings of systems are detected as confidence intervals narrow. The number of stimuli where p-values start to converge ranges from 400-800 stimuli. We conclude that, with enough stimuli, ASR can be more reliable than humans

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Confidence Intervals for ASR-based TTS Evaluation

https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/files/214712016/final_is21.pdf

Confidence Intervals for ASR-based TTS Evaluation

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Edinburgh Research Explorer