CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
The effect of length and inclination of carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminates on shear capacity of near-surface mounted retrofitted reinforced concrete beams
Authors
Y Al Rjoub
MJ Al-Kheetan
+4 more
M Al-Zu'bi
L Anguilano
A Ashteyat
M Fan
Publication date
29 September 2021
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
© 2021 The Authors. This study undertakes a comprehensive investigation of the shear behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened by near surface mounted (NSM) carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates. Different strengthening configurations were employed by varying the length and inclination angle of the CFRP laminates. Results indicated that NSM-CFRP strengthening increased the load-carrying capacity, ductility, stiffness, and toughness from 8% to 41%, 9% to 78%, 24% to 159%, and 22% to 254%, respectively. Results also confirmed that as the CFRP laminate length decreases, the efficacy of the strengthening process increases, where the load-carrying capacity, ductility, stiffness, and toughness improved from 8% to 19%, 10% to 21%, 8% to 68%, and 26% to 119%, respectively. Also, the comparative results revealed that specimens strengthened with 45°-inclined CFRP laminates versus those strengthened with vertical laminates had higher load-carrying capacity (2%–10%), ductility (1%–35%), stiffness (24%–40%), and toughness (13%–32%). Two analytical formulations to predict the contribution of the possible distinct NSM-CFRP shear strengthening configurations for the shear resistance of RC beams were considered. Results indicated an agreement between the experimental and the analytical results for both formulas, where the average values for the safety factor, k, urn:x-wiley:14644177:media:suco202100198:suco202100198-math-0001 were 0.80 and 0.73, with corresponding values of standard deviation of 0.195 and 0.125, respectively.Deanship of Research at Jordan University of Science and Technology. Grant Number: 214/2016
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Sustaining member
Brunel University Research Archive
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:bura.brunel.ac.uk:2438/236...
Last time updated on 06/12/2021