Background: The aim of this study was to compare pneumatic reduction under guidance of fluoroscopy and hydrostatic saline enema reduction under guidance of ultrasound in treatment of intussusception in pediatric patients.Methods: The study included 80 patients with intussusception in the time period from September 2014 to September 2015 who were divided into two groups: group A included 40 patients who underwent US guided hydrostatic reduction and group B included 40 patients who underwent fluoroscopic guided pneumatic reduction.Results: The success rate was significantly higher in the pneumatic group (80%) (P = 0.017) when compared to the hydrostatic group (55%) after 1st trial. However, the outcome was equal in both groups after the 2nd trial with success rate of 82.5%. The time needed for reduction was significantly shorter in the pneumaic group (P =0.001). There was only one case of perforation in hydrostatic group (2.5%).Conclusion: Pneumatic reduction is safe, simple, fast, less messy and as effective as hydrostatic reduction.Keywords: hydrostatic reduction, intussusception, pneumatic reductio
