Crisis clearly distinguishes itself from the large mass of economic
phenomena through its provocative force, which fuels theoretical discourse.
The more harmful, the more generous the energies it deploys and consumes
for explanatory and obstacle overcoming purposes. The result is that every
crisis teaches us a lesson. What interests us is who writes and who learns from
this lesson, and if they do. Then we try to find why serious crises, like the
current one, occur once or twice in a century. What is the role that big world
market players have in crisis "preparation", onset and resorption? Do solutions
originate in the state’s support or in the market? Does globalization erase
national borders in such situations? How and to what extent real economy
may penalize a guilty party that constantly comes from nominal economy?
What are the problems raised by such an outcome for the strategy to follow
and for economic sciences in general, etc.