El ejercicio de la actividad judicial involucra instituciones cuyo uso afecta
derechos fundamentales que causan daños susceptibles de comprometer la
responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado; es el caso de la privación injusta de
la libertad, por ello el presente artículo estudia el concepto de daño resarcible
dentro de este título de imputación desde el cambio jurisprudencial del
Consejo de Estado en el 2018, para determinar la aplicación del régimen
objetivo o subjetivo al momento de declarar dicha responsabilidad.The exercise of judicial activity involves institutions whose decisions can
affect people’s rights by the use of the law. These judgments can cause some
torts and these ones hold State accountable. As a result, the State should
compensate citizens for the torts caused by its institutions. This is an unfair
deprivation of liberty case and the reason why this article is presented. This
article studies the concept of torts within the existing legal basis of charging from jurisprudential changes made by Council of State of Colombia in
2018.This determines the implementation of the objectivity or subjectivity of
the legal regime when declaring such a responsibility
