Equivalent SU(3)fSU(3)_f approaches for two-body anti-triplet charmed baryon decays

Abstract

For the two-body anti-triplet charmed baryon decays, there exist two theoretical analyses based on the SU(3)SU(3) flavor (SU(3)fSU(3)_f) symmetry. One is the irreducible SU(3)fSU(3)_f approach (IRA), which depends on the irreducible SU(3)fSU(3)_f representation of the effective Hamiltonian. The other is the topological-diagram approach (TDA), where the decays are drawn to consist of WW-boson emission and WW-boson exchange topologies. We demonstrate that IRA and TDA can be equivalent, such that the IRA parameters can be seen to mix with the TDA topologies. The current observations of Ξc0β†’Ξžβˆ’Ο€+,Ξžβˆ’K+,Ξ›0KΛ‰0\Xi_c^0\to \Xi^-\pi^+,\Xi^- K^+,\Lambda^0\bar K^0 might cause theoretical difficulties. With the SU(3)fSU(3)_f symmetry breaking, we explain B(Ξc0β†’Ξžβˆ’Ο€+,Ξžβˆ’K+){\cal B}(\Xi_c^0\to\Xi^-\pi^+,\Xi^-K^+). It is found that a specific WW-boson exchange topology denoted by EME_M only appears in Ξc0β†’BM\Xi_c^0\to{\bf B}M, by which we explain B(Ξc0β†’Ξ›0KΛ‰0){\cal B}(\Xi_c^0\to\Lambda^0\bar K^0). In addition, we predict B(Ξc0β†’Ξ£0KΛ‰0,Ξ£+Kβˆ’)=(5.8βˆ’3.5+4.7,5.4βˆ’3.4+4.9)Γ—10βˆ’3{\cal B}(\Xi_c^0\to\Sigma^0\bar K^0,\Sigma^+ K^-)= (5.8^{+4.7}_{-3.5},5.4^{+4.9}_{-3.4})\times 10^{-3} for future measurements to test if EME_M can be a significant contribution.Comment: 13 pages, 7 tables, 1 figure, introduction rephrased, reference added, typos correcte

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions