Tensions between the academics teaching and research functions

Abstract

[ES] El desempeño profesional del profesorado universitario transcurre a lo largo de tensiones entre sus diversas funciones, especialmente entre la docencia y la investigación. Es bien sabido que al menos desde las dos últimas décadas, la Universidad española incentiva y valora más, en los diversos sistemas de promoción, el curriculum fruto de la investigación que el de la docencia. Presentamos los resultados referidos a la dualidad docencia‐investigación de la investigación realizada cuyo objetivo principal es estudiar la cultura organizacional de las universidades catalanas. La metodología utilizada es de corte cuantitativo‐cualitativo para la cuál se confecciona adhoc un cuestionario y un guión de entrevista semiestructurada. Los resultados nos indican que se percibe una cultura universitaria docente que debe cambiar hacia perfiles de intervención entre profesorado y alumnado más interactivos, ampliando el uso de materiales didácticos con soporte TIC, con sistemas evaluativos más diversos y centrados en las competencias a adquirir y menos en los contenidos memorísticos. Respecto a la cultura universitaria investigadora se percibe la necesidad de la internalización de la investigación, mayor participación en convocatorias competitivas nacionales, europeas e internacionales y en la publicación de los resultados en revistas de contrastado prestigio internacional. Y en relación a la primacía de la investigación sobre la docencia la percepción es de descontento. En conclusión tanto desde la percepción del propio profesorado como de los expertos entrevistados como del análisis de los proyectos institucionales de las universidades se desprende la necesidad de un cambio en las competencias docente e investigadora del profesorado universitario.[EN] The faculty's professional performance takes over tensions between its various functions, particularly between teaching and research. It is well known that at least since the last two decades, the Spanish University encourages and appreciates, in the various systems of promotion, more research than teaching. The article shows results related to the duality between teaching and research of a study whose main objective is to examine the organizational culture of the Catalan universities. The methodology used is quantitative and qualitative nature for which we build an adhoc questionnaire and a semistructured interview protocol. Results indicate that teachers perceive that the teaching culture needs to change towards approaches of greater focus on students‘ learning, enhancethe use of ICT , and use more diversified evaluation systems which are focused on desirable competences rather than on content. Regarding research culture, there is a perceived need for internacionalization of research, increase the participation in competitive national and international research projects and ist consequent publication in high impact international journals. In sum, teachers are displeased with the primacy of research over teaching. As a conclusion, the academics‘ self‐perception, that of interviewed experts and the analysis of university’s institutional documents clearly suggest the need for changes in the academics‘ teaching and research competences.Tomàs-Folch, M.; Castro Ceacero, D.; Feixas Condom, M. (2012). Tensiones entre las funciones docente e investigadora del profesorado en la universidad. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 10(1):343-367. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6135OJS343367101Austin, A. (1992). Faculty cultures. In Clark, b. & Neaves, g. (eds.), Encyclopedia of higher education. (pp.1614‐1623). Oxford: Pergamon.Beare, H., Caldwell, B.J. & Millikan, R.H. (1992). Cómo conseguir centros de calidad. Madrid: La Muralla.Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: priorities in the professiorate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Braxton, J.M. (1996). Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research. New directions for institutional research, 90, 5‐15.Clark, B. (1987). The academic life: small world, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Clark, B. (1997). The modern integration of research activities with teaching and learning. Journal of higher education, 68 ,3, 241‐255.Coates, K.; Barnett, R. & Williams, G. (2001). Relationship between teaching and research in higher education in England. Higher education quarterly, 55, 2, 158‐ 174.Dearing report (1997). National committee of inquiry into higher education. Http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe (accessed 10/10/07).Deem, R. & Lucas, L. (2006). Learning about research: exploring the learning and teaching/research relationship amongst educational practitioners studying in higher education. Teaching in higher education, 11, 1, 1‐18.De Miguel, J; Caïs, J; y Vaquera, E. (2001): Excelencia. Calidad de las universidades españolas. CIS, Madrid.Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: restoring the value of teaching and public service in American life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Feldman, K.A (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: a review and exploration. Research in higher education, 26, 227‐298.Greenbank, P. (2006). The academic's role: the need for a re‐evaluation? Teaching in higher education, 11, 1, 107‐112.Halse, C., Deane, E., Hobson, J., Jones, G. (2007). The research‐teaching nexus: what do national teaching awards tell us? Studies in higher education, 32, 6, 727‐746.Hannan, A. & Silver, H. (2000). Innovating in higher education: teaching, learning and institutional cultures. Buckingham: The Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.Hargreaves, A. & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: contrived collegialitty, colaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and teacher education, 6.Henkel, M. (1999). The modernization of research evaluation: the case of UK. Higher education, 38, 105‐122.Karlsson, J. (2007). Service as collaboration: an integrated process in teaching and research. A response to Greenbank. Teaching in higher education, 12, 2, 281‐287.Ley Orgánica de Universidades (2001).Llei d'Universitats de Catalunya (2003).Lucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching work within university education departments: fragmentation or integration? Journal of further and higher education, 31, 1, 17‐ 29.Miller, M.J. (2006). Conclusions‐towards a renewed humanistic paradigm for the European university. Higher education in Europe, 31, 4, 457‐469.M.E.C. (2007). Borrador del Estatuto del Funcionario docente no universitario. Consultable en: http://www.infoescuela.com/infoescuela/pdf/BorradorEstatutoMayo07.pdfMora, J‐G. (2001). The academic profession in Spain: between the civil service and the market. Higher education, 41, 131‐155.Moss, G. & Kubacki, K. (2007). Researchers in higher education: a neglected focus of study? Journal of further and higher education, 31, 3, 297‐310.Neumann, R. (1996). Researching the teaching‐research nexus: a critical review. Australian journal of education, 40, 1, 5‐18.Newman, J.H. (2007). The idea of a university. Avaiable online www.newmanreader.org/works/idea/preface.html (accessed 11/10/07).Palmer, A. & Collins, R. (2006). Perceptions of rewarding excellence in teaching: motivation and the scholarship of teaching. Journal of further and higher education, 30, 2, 193‐205.Pedró, F. & Sala, S. (2002). La profesión académica en los países de la unión europea: estado actual y tendencias de reforma. Informe final. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Rowland, S. (1996). Relationships between teaching and research. Teaching in higher education, 1, 1, 7‐20.Ruiz, J. J. (2004): "La evaluación de la investigación universitaria: perspectivas actuales y futuras". En Cajide, J. (2004): Calidad universitaria y empleo. Dickinson, Madrid.Sancho, J.M. (2001). Docencia e investigación en la universidad: una profesión, dos mundos. Educar, 28, 41‐60.Serow, R.C. et al. (2002). Cultures of undergraduate teaching at research universities. Innovative higher education, 27, 1 25‐37.Simons, M. & Elen, J. (2007). The 'research‐teaching nexus' and 'education through research': an exploration of ambivalences. Studies in higher education, 32, 5, 617‐631.Tomàs, M.; Armengol, C. y Feixas, M. (1999). Estudio de los ámbitos del cambio de cultura en la docencia universitaria. III Congrés d'Innovació educativa. 25 al 27/11/1999. Santiago de Compostela.Vidal, J. & Quintanilla, M.A. (2000). The teaching and research relationship within institucional evaluation. Higher education, 40, 221‐229.Wright, T. (2003). Postgraduate research students: people in context? British journal of guidance and counseling, 31, 2, 209‐227.Young, P. (2006). Out of balance: lecturer's perceptions of differential status and rewards in relation to teaching and research. Teaching in higher education, 11, 2, 191‐202.Zamorski, B. (2002). Research‐led teaching and learning in higher education: a case. Teaching in higher education, 7, 4, 411‐427

    Similar works