A.Bryman

A.Field

B. L.Berg

B.Somekh

C.Robson

C.Teddlie

D. M.Keats

D.Warwick

D.Yeates

J. W.Creswell

J.Daly

J.Fereday

M. Q.Patton

M.Saunders

N. K.Denzin

N. W. H.Blaikie

P.Rice

R. S.Pressman

R.Galliers

T. S.Rocco

T.May

Mixed-methods research, which comprises both quantitative and qualitative components, is widely perceived as a means to resolve the inherent limitations of traditional single method designs and is thus expected to yield richer and more holistic findings. Despite such distinctive benefits and continuous advocacy from Information Systems (IS) researchers, the use of mixed-methods approaches in the IS field has not been high. This chapter discusses some of the key reasons that led to this low application rate of mixed-methods design in the IS field, ranging from misunderstanding the term with multiple-methods research to practical difficulties for design and implementation. Two previous IS studies are used as examples to illustrate the discussion. The chapter concludes by recommending that in order to apply mixed-methods design successfully, IS researchers need to plan and consider thoroughly how the quantitative and qualitative components (i.e. from data collection to data analysis to reporting of findings) can be genuinely integrated together and supplement one another, in relation to the predefined research questions and the specific research contexts.</jats:p

Guo Chao Alex Peng

Fenio Annansingh

Crossref

Experiences in Applying Mixed-Methods Approach in Information Systems Research

Experiences in Applying Mixed-Methods Approach in Information Systems Research

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref