Abstract
Therapists seeing refugee populations often struggle with the traditional boundaries of
psychotherapy and conventional wisdom’s about therapeutic goals and practice. The
social, political and cultural context of the therapeutic work throws up dilemmas and
constraints that need to be better understood in working with these marginalized clients,
particularly those in uncontaining environments such as South Africa. Although many
refugees experience serious mental health problems and adjustment difficulties, the
context in which treatment is offered impacts on the type of psychotherapeutic
intervention and therapist stance that is optimal or possible. This study discusses
presenting strengths, dilemmas and possible guiding therapeutic principles that arose
from in-depth semi-structured interviews with 8 interviewees (4 psychotherapists and 4
refugee clients) concerning their experiences of conducting and being in medium term
psychotherapy, looking at similarities and differences in observations. In accordance with
the literature, this study found that the main descriptions of psychological distress
discussed by the refugee clients included those caused by past trauma and those that were
a response to current experiences. The prevalence of these symptoms stresses the
importance of psychological intervention. The strengths of psychotherapy noted by
refugee clients included: the preparation for psychotherapy through psycho-social
workshops, attaining of both emotional and general support, the psych-social approach
used by many of the therapists and the importance of foundational elements of
psychotherapy, such as the relationship. This research project found that experiencing a
containing therapeutic space was possible due to what refugees coined ‘the
professionalism of the therapists’. Therapists raised such issues such as having to step out
of the conventional therapist role, having to deal with the impact of the horror stories
described by refugees, struggles to identify appropriate therapeutic approaches,
difficulties in assisting refugees to establish sustainable support networks and not
meeting refugees’ expectations that they will be ‘fully healed’ through therapy. Possible
guiding therapeutic principles, such as working within the supportive framework of a two
phased integrative framework, are also discussed. The study found that ideally speaking,
therapists and refugee clients are more supported if therapy is offered as part of a multidimensional
and multidisciplinary approach
