Nicholson, Michael

English

This article discusses some controversies over the relations of the academic discipline of International Relations to policy. The article argues that, while our ultimate goal may be to have some impact on the world, the immediate goals can be more abstract. International Relations consists, and should consist, of a set of Lakatosian Research Programmes, some conflicting, some complementary, which range from the abstract to the directly policy-relevant. Effective intervention in social systems depends on analyses in more than commonsense terms. The article looks sceptically on recent disciplinary history, doubting both the supposed positivist hegemony and the supposed novelty of normative debate.</jats:p

MICHAEL NICHOLSON

Crossref

Review of International Studies

What's the use of International Relations?

Michael Nicholson (8932307)

Sussex Research Online

What's the Use of International Relations?

Collected Works, volume 2: Quantitative Psychology and Studies of Conflict (Cambridge:

Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations

The Idea of a Social Science (London: Routledge, 2nd edn. 1990, 1st edn.

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.

The Theory of Justice

Winch’s views are discussed sympathetically in

http://srodev.sussex.ac.uk/37698/1/S0260210500001832a.pdf

What's the Use of International Relations?

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

Sussex Research Online