CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Application of in situ stress estimation methods in wellbore stability analysis under isotropic and anisotropic conditions
Authors
Al-Ajmi
Amadei
+56 more
Auld
Bachman
Berard
Bernt Aadnoy
Bona
Bradford
Bratton
Brent
Chatterjee
Eghtesadi
Esmersoy
Fischer
Fjaer
Fjaer
Gholami
Gholami
Heidbach
Higgins
Hudson
Jaeger
Jaeger
Lehtonen
Lekhnitskii
Lin
Lo
Maleki
Matsuki
Moeck
Mohr
Mueller
NISOC R&D Solutions Project #1 NISOC
Norris
Nur
Plumb
Rajabi
Ramin Mohammadi
Raoof Gholami
Rasouli
Singha
Singha
Sinha
Sinha
Sinha
Smart
Thomsen
Tsvankin
Ulusay
Vamegh Rasouli
Walsh
Wang
Wang
Yamamoto
Zang
Zhang
Zoback
Zoback
Publication date
1 January 2015
Publisher
'IOP Publishing'
Doi
Abstract
© 2015 Sinopec Geophysical Research Institute. Estimation of in situ stresses is a key step in many petroleum engineering applications, ranging from wellbore stability to sanding analysis and hydraulic fracturing design. Direct techniques conventionally used to determine in situ stresses are indeed very time consuming and expensive. These measurements would also be restricted as to the depth of acquisition, and generalization of the results to entire rock masses may not yield representative results. In this paper, applications of three indirect methods-Zoback's polygon, shear moduli, and poroelastic-are studied to assess their applicability in providing reliable stress estimation under isotropic and anisotropic conditions. Determination of elastic, strength, and in situ stress parameters according to the assumption of each method for one of the vertical wells drilled in south Iran indicated that the shear moduli method is an appropriate approach for prediction of maximum horizontal stress within an interval where sufficient field data including leak-off tests are acquired. However, the poroelastic method seems to be a better method in prediction of in situ stresses under anisotropic conditions. This might be due to the presence of excessive shale formations in subsurface layers, causing structural or intrinsic anisotropy-based methods such as poroelastic equations to deliver more accurate results. However, making general conclusions based on studying a single vertical wellbore may not be sufficient, and therefore further studies are required
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
espace@Curtin
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:espace.curtin.edu.au:20.50...
Last time updated on 18/04/2019
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1088%2F1742-2132%2...
Last time updated on 11/12/2019