[EN] The art market operates in a very different way from conventional economic markets, ranging from its behaviors of supply and demand, the trading of goods, and the economic agents intervening in it. In addition, it is a highly unregulated market, with very little standardized information in economic terms. This paper focuses on art galleries, which are the most influential intermediaries in the Spanish primary contemporary fine-art market and perform a role that goes beyond the mere distribution of works of art. This study develops and applies a prospective methodology based on the subjective information compiled by experts, known as the Delphi method, to identify and evaluate the factors that determine the current situation and future outlook for Spanish contemporary art galleries. The results show, on one hand, that the method employed constitutes a valid option to provide reliable information. In addition, they show that the survival of these organizations will depend on their ability to adapt to the changing conditions of the economic environment, reactivating and internationalizing demand, and redirecting their business model towards sustainable management by implementing appropriate business management models and techniques.Mateos-Ronco, A.; Peiró Torralba, N. (2019). Sustainable Management of Contemporary Art Galleries: A Delphi Survey for the Spanish Art Market. Sustainability. 11(2):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020541S115112Baumol, W. J. (1985). Unnatural Value: Or Art Investment as Floating Crap Game. Journal of Arts Management and Law, 15(3), 47-60. doi:10.1080/07335113.1985.9942162Ginsburgh, V., & Jeanfils, P. (1995). Long-term comovements in international markets for paintings. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 538-548. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00060-dChanel, O. (1995). Is art market behaviour predictable? European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 519-527. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00058-8Gérard-Varet, L.-A. (1995). On pricing the priceless: Comments on the economics of the visual art market. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 509-518. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)00057-7Holub, H. W., Hutter, M., & Tappeiner, G. (1993). Light and shadow in art price computation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 17(1), 49-69. doi:10.1007/bf00820767Beckert, J., & Rössel, J. (2013). THE PRICE OF ART. European Societies, 15(2), 178-195. doi:10.1080/14616696.2013.767923Schönfeld, S., & Reinstaller, A. (2007). The effects of gallery and artist reputation on prices in the primary market for art: a note. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(2), 143-153. doi:10.1007/s10824-007-9031-1Abdullah, A., Khadaroo, I., & Napier, C. J. (2018). Managing the performance of arts organisations: Pursuing heterogeneous objectives in an era of austerity. The British Accounting Review, 50(2), 174-184. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.001Komarova, N., & Velthuis, O. (2017). Local contexts as activation mechanisms of market development: contemporary art in emerging markets. Consumption Markets & Culture, 21(1), 1-21. doi:10.1080/10253866.2017.1284065Landeta, J., Matey, J., Ruíz, V., & Galter, J. (2008). Results of a Delphi survey in drawing up the input–output tables for Catalonia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(1), 32-56. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.005Hayes, T. (2007). Delphi study of the future of marketing of higher education. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 927-931. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.009Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002Maguire, J. S., & Matthews, J. (2012). Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 551-562. doi:10.1177/1367549412445762JOY*, A., & SHERRY, JR.‡, J. F. (2003). Disentangling the paradoxical alliances between art market and art world. Consumption Markets & Culture, 6(3), 155-181. doi:10.1080/1025386032000153759Mateos-Ronco, A., & Server Izquierdo, R. J. (2011). Drawing up the official adjustment rules for damage assessment in agricultural insurance: Results of a Delphi survey for fruit crops in Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1542-1556. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.003Webler, T., Levine, D., Rakel, H., & Renn, O. (1991). A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 253-263. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90040-mSTRAUSS, H. J., & ZEIGLER, L. H. (1975). The Delphi Technique and Its Uses In Social Science Research*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(4), 253-259. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1975.tb00574.xRowe, G., Wright, G., & Bolger, F. (1991). Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 235-251. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-iWoudenberg, F. (1991). An evaluation of Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 40(2), 131-150. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90002-wTuroff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149-171. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7Landeta, J., Barrutia, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1629-1641. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009Nowack, M., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2011). Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: Quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1603-1615. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.006Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1487-1490. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375. doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00018-7Dajani, J. S., Sincoff, M. Z., & Talley, W. K. (1979). Stability and agreement criteria for the termination of Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13(1), 83-90. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(79)90007-6Chaffin, W. W., & Talley, W. K. (1980). Individual stability in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16(1), 67-73. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(80)90074-8Rowe, G., Wright, G., & McColl, A. (2005). Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(4), 377-399. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.03.004Curioni, S. B., & Rizzi, E. M. R. (2016). Two realms in confrontation: consensus or discontinuity? An exploratory study on the convergence of critical assessment and market evaluation in the contemporary art system. Museum Management and Curatorship, 31(5), 440-459. doi:10.1080/09647775.2016.1227571Estadística de Financiación y Gasto Público en Cultura http://www.culturaydeporte.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas/cultura/mc/culturabase/gasto-publico/resultados-gasto-publico.htmlPrinz, A., Piening, J., & Ehrmann, T. (2014). The success of art galleries: a dynamic model with competition and information effects. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(2), 153-176. doi:10.1007/s10824-014-9217-2Wróblewski, Ł., Dziadzia, B., & Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2018). Sustainable Management of the Offer of Cultural Institutions in the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services—Barriers and Conditions. Sustainability, 10(9), 3253. doi:10.3390/su1009325
