[ES] Este artículo describe las fases de construcción de una ontología terminológica dentro de la arquitectura de FunGramKB, una base de conocimiento léxico-conceptual para el procesamiento computacional del lenguaje natural. La descomposición semántica de la terminología compleja se realiza siguiendo el proceso COHERENT, esto es, una metodología gradual para la formalización de conceptos especializados. Para tratar de ilustrar este proceso hemos seleccionado el concepto +DRUG_00, así como otros conceptos subordinados, tales como METHAMPHETAMINE00,CANNABIS_00 y COCAINE_00 pertenecientes al dominio de las sustancias estupefacientes (drogas). Las definiciones de los conceptos seleccionados se basan en COREL, un metalenguaje de interfaz inspirado en algunos principios generales de la Gramática del Rol y la Referencia (GRR). Como resultado del proceso de modelado, subsunción y jerarquización, la ruta conceptual superior de la ontología se representa en la Ontología Satélite dentro de FunGramKB según el siguiente esquema: #ENTITY > #PHYSICAL > #OBJECT > #SELF_CONNECTED_OBJECT > +ARTIFICIAL_OBJECT_00 > +SUBSTANCE_00 > +SOLID_00 > +DRUG_00. [EN] This article describes some phases in the process of constructing a term-based Satellite Ontology within the architecture of the Core Ontology integrated in FunGramKB (a lexico-conceptual knowledge base for the computational processing of natural language). The semantic decomposition of complex terminology is implemented following the COHERENT methodology (a stepwise method for formalizing specialized concepts). For that purpose, we have selected the superordinate concept +DRUG_00 as well as other subordinate concepts in the domain of drugs such as METHAMPHETAMINE_00, CANNABIS00,andCOCAINE_00. The definitions of the concepts selected for the study are based on COREL, an interface metalanguage inspired on some general principles of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). As a result of the modeling, subsumption and hierarchization process the top conceptual path is represented in the Satellite Ontology as follows: #ENTITY > #PHYSICAL > #OBJECT > SELF_CONNECTED_OBJECT > +ARTIFICIAL_OBJECT_00 > +SUBSTANCE_00 > +SOLID_00> +DRUG_00.Este artículo forma parte del proyecto de investigación I+D+i titulado “Representación formal de una ontología sobre derecho penal y su integración en una base de conocimiento para la comprensión del lenguaje natural”, financiado en el marco del Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía 2014-2020 (Junta de Andalucía). Código: B-HUM-177-UGR18Felices Lago, ÁM.; Ureña Gómez-Moreno, P. (2020). Conceptualización de entidades terminológicas en una subontología de derecho penal: análisis del concepto superordinado +DRUG_00 en FunGramKb. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 15(1):15-25. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2020.12772OJS1525151Asaro, C., Biasiotti, M.A., Guidotti, P., Papini, M., Sagri, M.T., Tiscornia, D. (2003). "A Domain Ontology: Italian Crime Ontology". ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management, 1-7.Bak, J., Jedrzejek, C., Falkowski, M. (2010). "Application of an Ontology-Based and Rule-Based Model to Selected Economic Crimes: Fraudulent Disbursement and Money Laundering", en M. Dean, J. Hall, A. Rotolo, S. & S. Tabet (eds.) RuleML 2010. LNCS, vol. 6403. Heidelberg: Springer, 210-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16289-3_18Bezzazi, E. H. (2007). "Building an Ontology That Helps Identify Criminal Law Articles That Apply to a Cybercrime Case", en ICSOFT (PL/DPS/KE/MUSE), 179-185.Bowker, L., Pearson, J. (2002). Working with Specialized Language. A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. Londres, Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469255Breuker, J., Winkels, R. (2003). "Use and reuse of legal ontologies in Knowledge Engineering and Information Management". ICAIL03 Wks on Legal Ontologies and Web-based Information Management, Edimburgo, http://lri.jur.uva.nl/~winkels/legontICAIL2003.htmlBreuker J., Casanovas, P., Klein, M.A.C., Francesconi, E. (eds.) (2008). Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Carrión, M.G. (2012). "Extracción y análisis de unidades léxico-conceptuales del dominio jurídico: un acercamiento metodológico desde FunGramKB", RaeL, 11, 25-39.Cortés, F., Mairal, R. (2016). "Building an RRG computational grammar", Onomázein, 34, 86-117. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.34.22Felices, A. (2015). "Foundational considerations for the development of the Globalcrimeterm subontology: A research project based on FunGramKB", Onomázein, 31, 127-144. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.31.9Felices, A. (2016). "The Process of Constructing Ontological Meaning Based on Criminal Law Verbs", Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 65, 109-148. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CLAC.2016.v65.51983Felices, A., Ureña, P. (2012). "Fundamentos metodológicos de la creación subontológica en FunGramKB", Onomázein, 26, 49-67.Felices, A., Ureña, P. (2014). "FunGramKB Term Extractor: a key instrument for building a satellite ontology based on a specialized corpus". En B. Nolan & C. Periñán (eds.) Language processing and grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.150.10felFelices, A., Alameda, A. (2017). "The process of building the upper-level hierarchy for the aircraft structure ontology to be integrated in FunGramKB", Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 23(2), 86-110.Gangemi A., Sagri MT., Tiscornia D. (2005) A Constructive Framework for Legal Ontologies. In: Benjamins V.R., Casanovas P., Breuker J., Gangemi A. (eds) Law and the Semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3369. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_7Gruber, T.R. (1993). "A translation approach to portable ontologies". Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008Jiménez, R., Luzondo, A. (2011). "Building Ontological Meaning in a Lexico-conceptual Knowledge Base", Onomázein, 23, 11-40.Koester, A. (2010). "Building small specialised corpora". En A. O' Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Londres: Routledge, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch6Lenci, A., Bel, N., Busa, F., Calzolari, N., Gola, E., Monachini, M., Ogonowski, A. Peters, I., Peters, W., Ruimy, N., Villegas, M., Zampolli, A. (2000). "SIMPLE: A general framework for the development of multilingual lexicon", International Journal of Lexicography, 13/4, 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/13.4.249Martín-Mingorance, L. (1994). "La lexicografía onomasiológica". En Hernández Hernández, H. (ed.) Aspectos de lexicografía contemporánea. Barcelona: Biglograf, 15-28.Musen, M.A. (1992). "Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse". Computers and Biomedical Research 25, 435- 467. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4809(92)90003-SNiles, I., Pease, A. (2001). "Towards a standard Upper Ontology". En Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Ogunquit. https://doi.org/10.1145/505168.505170.Osathitporn, P., Soonthornphisaj, N., Vatanawood, W. (2017). "A scheme of criminal law knowledge acquisition using ontology". En 2017 18th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD). IEEE. 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2017.8022696Periñán, C. (2012). "En defensa del procesamiento del lenguaje natural fundamentado en la lingüística teórica", Onomázein, 26, 13-48.Periñán, C. (2013). "A knowledge-engineering approach to the cognitive categorization of lexical meaning", VIAL-Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 85-104.Periñán, C. (2015). "The underpinnings of a composite measure for automatic term extraction: the case of SRC", Terminology, 21/2, 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1075/term.21.2.02perPeriñán, C. (2017). "Bridging the gap within text-data analytics: a computer environment for data analysis in linguistic research", Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 23/2, 111-132.Periñán, C. (2018). "DEXTER: a workbench for automatic term extraction with specialized corpora", Natural Language Engineering, 24/2, 163-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324917000365Periñán, C., Arcas, F. (2004). "Meaning postulates in a lexico-conceptual knowledge base". En 15th International Workshop on Databases and Expert Systems Applications, IEEE, Los Alamitos (California), 38-42.Periñán, C., Arcas, F. (2010a). The architecture of FunGramKB. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2667-2674.Periñán, C., Arcas, F. (2010b). "Ontological commitments in FunGramKB", Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 44, 27-34.Periñán, C., Mairal, R. (2010). "La gramática de COREL: un lenguaje de representación conceptual", Onomázein, 21, 11-45.Periñán, C., Arcas, F. (2014). "The implementation of the FunGramKB CLS Constructor". En B. Nolan y C. Periñán (eds.), Language Processing and Grammars: The Role of Functionally Oriented Computational Models. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.150.07perPeriñán, C., Arcas, F. (2019). "Detecting environmentally-related problems on Twitter", Biosystems Engineering, 177, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.10.001Periñán, C., Mairal, R. (2010). "Enhancing UniArab with FunGramKB", Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 44, 19-26.Periñán, C., Mairal, R. (2011). "The COHERENT Methodology in FunGramKB", Onomázein, 24, 13-33.Procter, P. (Ed.) (1978). Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow: Longman.Ruiz de Mendoza, F., Mairal, R. (2008). "Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an Introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model", Folia Linguistica, 42/2, 355-400. https://doi.org/10.1515/FLIN.2008.355San Martín, A., Faber, P. (2014). "Deep semantic representation in a domain-specific ontology: Linking EcoLexicon to FunGramKB". En B. Nolan & C. Periñán (eds.) Language Processing and Grammars: The Role of Functionally Oriented Computational Models. Amsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins, 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.150.11marSartor, G., Casanovas, P., Biasiotti, M.A., Fernández-Barrera, M. (eds.) (2011) Approaches to Legal Ontologies, Theories, Domains, Methodologies. Berlín: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5Soh, C., Lim, S., Hong, K., Rhim, Y.Y. (2018). Ontology Modeling for Criminal Law. En U. Pagallo, M. Palmirani, P. Casanovas, G. Sartor, S. Villata (eds.) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems AICOL 2015, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10791. Cham: Springer, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_25Valente, A., Breuker, J. (1994). "A functional view of law", en G. Bargellini & S. Binazzi (eds.) Towards a Global Expert System in Law. Padua: CEDAM Publishers.Valente, A. (2005). "Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies". En V.R. Benjamins, Casanovas, P., Breuker, j., Gangemi, A. (eds.), Law and the Semantic Web. Berlín: Springer, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_5Van Valin, R.D. (2005). The Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface: An Introduction to Role and Reference Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578.002Van Valin, R.D., LaPolla, R.J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799Velardi, P., Pazienza, M.T., Fasolo, M. (1991). "How to encode semantic Knowledge: a method for meaning representation and computer-aided acquisition", Computational Linguistics, 17/2, 153-170
