Abstract
This article examined the effectiveness of situational and emotional variables in predicting the acceptability of wolf management actions in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Three hypotheses were advanced: (a) both situational and emotional variables will influence acceptability ratings, (b) emotions will explain the largest proportion of variance for the lethal management action, and (c) this pattern of findings will be the same for residents and visitors. Data were obtained from a survey of local residents and a survey of visitors to Grand Teton National Park. Two situational variables (location of encounter, wolf status) and three emotional variables (sympathy for ranchers, sympathy for wolves, anger about wolves) were included as independent variables. The dependent variables were acceptability of non-lethal and lethal management. Regression analyses supported the hypotheses. While debates regarding wolves are likely to continue, these findings highlight the role that emotion plays in evaluating the acceptability of management actions
