The ``N-Box Experiment'' is a much-discussed thought experiment in quantum
mechanics. It is claimed by some authors that a single particle prepared in a
superposition of N+1 box locations and which is subject to a final
``post-selection'' measurement corresponding to a different superposition can
be said to have occupied ``with certainty'' N boxes during the intervening
time. However, others have argued that under closer inspection, this surprising
claim fails to hold. Aharonov and Vaidman have continued their advocacy of the
claim in question by proposing a variation on the N-box experiment, in which
the boxes are replaced by shutters and the pre- and post-selected particle is
entangled with a photon. These authors argue that the resulting ``N-shutter
experiment'' strengthens their original claim regarding the N-box experiment.
It is argued in this paper that the apparently surprising features of this
variation are no more robust than those of the N-box experiment and that it is
not accurate to say that the particle is ``with certainty'' in all N shutters
at any given time.Comment: Presentation improved; to appear in International Studies in
Philosophy of Scienc