Classifying torsion pairs of Noetherian algebras

Abstract

For a commutative Noetherian ring RR and a module-finite RR-algebra Ξ›\Lambda, we study the set torsΞ›\mathsf{tors} \Lambda (respectively, torfΞ›\mathsf{torf}\Lambda) of torsion (respectively, torsionfree) classes of the category of finitely generated Ξ›\Lambda-modules. We construct a bijection from torfΞ›\mathsf{torf}\Lambda to ∏ptorf(Ξ›βŠ—RΞΊ(p))\prod_{\mathfrak{p}} \mathsf{torf}(\Lambda\otimes_R \kappa(\mathfrak{p})), and an embedding Ξ¦\Phi from torsΞ›\mathsf{tors} \Lambda to TR(Ξ›):=∏ptors(Ξ›βŠ—RΞΊ(p))\mathbb{T}_R(\Lambda):=\prod_{\mathfrak{p}} \mathsf{tors}(\Lambda\otimes_R \kappa(\mathfrak{p})), where p\mathfrak{p} runs all prime ideals of RR. When Ξ›=R\Lambda=R, these give classifications of torsionfree classes, torsion classes and Serre subcategories of modR\mathsf{mod} R due to Takahashi, Stanley-Wang and Gabriel. To give a description of ImΞ¦\mathrm{Im} \Phi, we introduce the notion of compatible elements in TR(Ξ›)\mathbb{T}_R(\Lambda), and prove that all elements in ImΞ¦\mathrm{Im} \Phi are compatible. We give a sufficient condition on (R,Ξ›)(R, \Lambda) such that all compatible elements belong to ImΞ¦\mathrm{Im} \Phi (we call (R,Ξ›)(R, \Lambda) compatible in this case). For example, if RR is semi-local and dim⁑R≀1\dim R \leq 1, then (R,Ξ›)(R, \Lambda) is compatible. We also give a sufficient condition in terms of silting Ξ›\Lambda-modules. As an application, for a Dynkin quiver QQ, (R,RQ)(R, RQ) is compatible and we have a poset isomorphism torsRQ≃Homposet(SpecR,CQ)\mathsf{tors} RQ \simeq \mathsf{Hom}_{\rm poset}(\mathsf{Spec} R, \mathfrak{C}_Q) for the Cambrian lattice CQ\mathfrak{C}_Q of QQ.Comment: 33 pages, one subsection was moved to Appendix, some propositions were added in Section

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions