The original Lindhard-Scharff-Schi{\o}tt (LSS) theory and the more recent
Tilinin theory for calculating the nuclear and electronic stopping powers of
slow heavy ions are compared with predictions from the SRIM code by Ziegler.
While little discrepancies are present for the nuclear contribution to the
energy loss, large differences are found in the electronic one. When full ion
recoil cascade simulations are tested against the elastic neutron scattering
data available in the literature, it can be concluded that the LSS theory is
the more accurate.Comment: Presented at the 10th International Symposium on Radiation Physics,
17-22 September, 2006, Coimbra, Portugal; style corrections, small change to
fig.