This paper deals with the ways that the issue of completing quantum mechanics
was brought into laboratories and became a topic in mainstream quantum optics.
It focuses on the period between 1965, when Bell published what now we call
Bell's theorem, and 1982, when Aspect published the results of his experiments.
I argue that what was considered good physics after Aspect's experiments was
once considered by many a philosophical matter instead of a scientific one, and
that the path from philosophy to physics required a change in the physics
community's attitude about the status of the foundations of quantum mechanics.Comment: 57 pages, accepted by Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern
Physic