CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Causal uncertainty and correction of judgments
Authors
Leigh Ann Vaughn
Gifford Weary
Publication date
1 January 2003
Publisher
Digital Commons IC
Abstract
We examined whether raising uncertainty about the causes of one\u27s judgments motivates correction. Specifically, we examined whether activating chronically accessible causal uncertainty (CU) beliefs with a conditional warning about possible bias enhances correction of weather judgments for tropical weather primes and of word frequency judgments for the availability bias. In two studies we showed that activating chronic beliefs led to careful correction of target judgments. Moreover, Study 2 revealed that chronically high-CU individuals who received a conditional warning felt more uncertain than did other participants, but that this uncertainty was suppressed somewhat by adjusting for the bias. Results are discussed in light of recent models of judgment correction (e.g., Wegener & Petty, 1997), and the causal uncertainty model (Weary & Edwards, 1996). © 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Ithaca College
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:digitalcommons.ithaca.edu:...
Last time updated on 03/05/2021