We show that a recently discovered fourth order symplectic algorithm, which
requires one evaluation of force gradient in addition to three evaluations of
the force, when iterated to higher order, yielded algorithms that are far
superior to similarly iterated higher order algorithms based on the standard
Forest-Ruth algorithm. We gauge the accuracy of each algorithm by comparing the
step-size independent error functions associated with energy conservation and
the rotation of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector when solving a highly eccentric
Kepler problem. For orders 6, 8, 10 and 12, the new algorithms are
approximately a factor of 103, 104, 104 and 105 better.Comment: 23 pages, 10 figure