Accountability

Hans Krause Hansen

Julie Uldam

Liberate Tate

English


Purpose
Corporations are increasingly expected to act responsibly. The purpose of this paper is to examine two types of corporate responses to these expectations: overt and covert responses. Specifically, it examines oil companies’ involvement in multi-stakeholder initiatives and sponsorships (overt responses) and their monitoring of critics, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and activist organisations (covert responses).


Design/methodology/approach
Theoretically, the paper draws on theories of visibility and post-political regulation. Empirically, it focuses on case studies of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), Shell and BP, drawing on qualitative methods.


Findings
The paper demonstrates that overt responses create an impression of consensus between antagonistic interests and that covert responses support this impression by containing deep-seated conflicts.


Research limitations/implications
Corporate responses have implications for the role of the corporation as a (post-)political actor. By containing antagonism and creating an impression of consensus, the interplay between overt and covert responses open up further possibilities for the proliferation of soft governance and self-regulation through participation in voluntary transparency and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Data on covert practices of corporations are difficult to access. This impedes possibilities for fully assessing their extent. The findings of this paper support trends emerging from recent research on covert corporate intelligence practices, but more research is needed to provide a systematic overview.


Originality/value
The paper contributes to the understudied area of covert corporate activity in research on the political role of multinational corporations.
</jats:sec

Crossref

Critical Perspectives on International Business

Corporate responses to stakeholder activism: partnerships and surveillance

Corporations are increasingly expected to act responsibly. The purpose of this paper is to examine two types of corporate responses to these expectations: overt and covert responses. Specifically, it examines oil companies’ involvement in multi-stakeholder initiatives and sponsorships (overt responses) and their monitoring of critics, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and activist organisations (covert responses)

Uldam, Julie

Krause Hansen, Hans

Roskilde Universitet

Corporate responses to stakeholder activism:partnerships and surveillance

https://forskning.ruc.dk/files/63157091/CorporateResponsestoStakeholderActivism.pdf

Corporate responses to stakeholder activism:partnerships and surveillance

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

Roskilde Universitet