Recently, Davids and Typel recommended a "low" value of S_{17}(0) based on
fits to published direct and Coulomb dissociation data, in which they excluded
the precise result of Junghans et al. We show that their statistical analysis
is incorrect, due to a substantial underestimate of the experimental
uncertainties, and leads to conclusions that are not supported by a proper
analysis.Comment: submitted to Phys. Rev.